SSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 days agoturing completenesssopuli.xyzimagemessage-square69linkfedilinkarrow-up1997
arrow-up1997imageturing completenesssopuli.xyzSSUPII@sopuli.xyz to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 11 days agomessage-square69linkfedilink
minus-squareexplodicle@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·10 days agoSince when do they pass the Turing test? They’re infuriatingly bad.
minus-squarevodka@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up21·10 days agoEven the first version of ChatGPT passed turing tests. It takes surprisingly little for an LLM to make natural language responses that are indistinguishable from a human. Especially when factual accuracy was never part of it.
minus-squarezaph@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up6·10 days agoConsidering how easy they were to break by saying “ignore previous instructions” I’ma have to disagree
minus-squarevodka@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3·10 days agoI’m sure that’d work on some humans too.
minus-squarepotoooooooo ☑️@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·10 days agoDon’t listen to this guy.
Since when do they pass the Turing test? They’re infuriatingly bad.
Even the first version of ChatGPT passed turing tests.
It takes surprisingly little for an LLM to make natural language responses that are indistinguishable from a human. Especially when factual accuracy was never part of it.
Considering how easy they were to break by saying “ignore previous instructions” I’ma have to disagree
I’m sure that’d work on some humans too.
Don’t listen to this guy.