• lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    Not disagreeing that they’re probably just inconsistent.

    Is it possible to be consistent about moral relativism & still make firm choices?

    What’s it called when morality is construed as systems of arbitrarily chosen axioms & moral judgements amount to judges stating whether something agrees with a system they chose? Is it inconsistent to acknowledge that these axioms are ultimately choices, choose a system, and judge all actions eligible for moral consideration according to that chosen system?