• nailingjello@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    Text for the lazy.

    Duverger’s Law

    In political science, Duverger’s law holds that single-ballot plurality-rule elections (such as first past the post) structured within single-member districts tend to favor a two-party system.

    Duverger’s law is the reason why U.S. voters select one of the two leading candidates when voting tactically, even if a third-party candidate would better represent their interests. This behavior arises out to fear of vote splitting

    One consequence of Duverger’s law is that you can improve the viability of third-party candidates by changing the voting system. For example, Approval voting is more resistant to vote splitting and therefore more conducive to third-party candidates.

  • tyler@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    STAR or 3-2-1 voting are both much much better options than Approval Voting. Please advocate for one of those two rather than Approval or RCV. Yes, Approval is much better than RCV, but we’re only going to get one chance to change voting systems. If it goes wrong locales will switch back and never try again.

  • A_norny_mousse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Cool, now I can really strut my stuff. Whenever someone comments “first past the post is bad” or “2-party systems suck” I can reply “Duverger’s law!”