Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agoFraudsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1608
arrow-up1608imageFraudsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 3 days agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoThere are more then one species of tigers though, so the tiger average should be lower. I’m not able to tell what species is pictured there though - if it is siberian, then ok, pretend I didn’t say a word.
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 days agoThere are also a couple subspecies of leo but I stated in my comment “assume optimal condition”.
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoOk, if optimal condition means optimal species :)
minus-squarefinitebanjo@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoI think you’ll agree that a 300 lbs tiger is not the optimal subspecies for a large cat deathmatch. It’s very much suboptimal, yes.
There are more then one species of tigers though, so the tiger average should be lower. I’m not able to tell what species is pictured there though - if it is siberian, then ok, pretend I didn’t say a word.
There are also a couple subspecies of leo but I stated in my comment “assume optimal condition”.
Ok, if optimal condition means optimal species :)
I think you’ll agree that a 300 lbs tiger is not the optimal subspecies for a large cat deathmatch. It’s very much suboptimal, yes.