• Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not to mention that Swartz had a JSTOR account, which means he was legally entitled to download the things that he did. The part they didn’t like was that he used scripts to download en-mass, and a bunch of boomer fucks thought he actually committed a crime.

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well in the Social Network movie and chapter 2 of the Accidental Billionaires, Mark Zuckerberg used wget in shell scripts to get copyrighted images for private servers.

      Can we give punish him?

      • sus@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        Spotify also originally got all its music by pirating it. But later it started printing money for record labels (while fucking over musicians) so all was forgiven.

      • Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, he’s part of the US oligarchy. Don’t criticize too much or you might happen to have sudden, unexplainable tech problems and legal trouble. /s

    • coronach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      To be fair, he broke and entered a networking closet as well. But I guess that is a separate issue.

      • thisisnotgoingwell@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        The university AND jstor were pretty quick to get as uninvolved from that mess as quick as possible, so it really doesn’t matter… But what you’re saying has nothing to do with the case and is also not true. “Broke and entered” implies forced physical access into a clearly forbidden area. The network closet was a room that was left unlocked and was frequently used by janitorial staff to put junk in.

        • The Ramen Dutchman@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          My grandma is the opposite of this, he embraces learning new technology and wants to stay informed with new developments.
          So far my dad is like this as well.
          I strive to become like them, they’re both pretty great people all-round!

    • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m with you right up to the ageism. The folks who persecuted Aaron were older than him, but they were not boomers, and what they did had nothing to do with his age or theirs.

      Bigotry is always wrong.

            • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              When it is used to denigrate a “mindset” that you don’t like, it is most certainly a slur. When used to refer to folks who were born between 1945 and 1960, it is not.

              We’ve all agreed (almost all) to stop using the word retarded to refer derogatorily to folks who do not have that medical condition.

              Any word can be used as a slur.

              • itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Any word can be used as a slur? Really? Please explain what a slur is to you. I agree that every word can be used as an insult, you absolute Brokkoli, but that’s down to tone and context, more than anything, isn’t a slur more than that?