• rapchee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2日前

    would you say the same thing if the division was written out like a line under 2(3) and under that 6
    idk how this’ll come out but something like this:
    2(1+2)
    -----------
    6

    edit : wow i did a formatting thing
    edit2: i got it (ish)

    • AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2日前

      In that case, I’d say the answer is 1. Top and bottom are each resolved to the fullest extent possible before dividing top by bottom. It’s equivalent to (top)÷(bottom), but it’s clearer and preferable if you can easily format that way in my opinion, just harder on a computer.

    • Reyali@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2日前

      I think that’s why people are complaining about the division sign.

      It’s been decades since I took a math class so I am definitely not the right person to explain things, but I am using technology to confirm my understanding of the various notations:

      So yeah, if you put 6 over a denominator of 2(1+2), the answer is different (1) because the equation is different. But if you write it out literally, it would be 6 over 2 times (1+2).

      What you wrote swapped the denominator to make it 2(1+2)÷6, which will always be 1.