• SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 days ago

    Yeah I’d say there might be a bigger problem with leftists trying to associate things like healthcare programs with the word socialism that’s holding things back.

    Kinda disconnected from reality when you’re saying we should do X because X is something failed systems have done. Might be more successful to say we should do X because X is good and it won’t make us into a failed state.

    • kurwa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      Yeah socialism is going to make the US fail, it’s totally not currently failing rn… LOL

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        Maybe we should consider looking at what has actually worked instead of debating between which failed system to implement? There’s more options than just laissez faire capitalism and socialism ya know.

        • kurwa@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          I think failed is a loaded term you’re using here. But more important to me than labels is that I believe in free healthcare, housing, food and education. Lots of countries do that already or at least a good portion of those, and the US doesn’t.

    • auntieclokwise@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      Yeah, we have a phobia around the word socialism. Probably part of why the DSA won’t ever be more than a small minority, even if they DO have the right idea about alot of things (a few things they’re really not right on though - like abolition of private property as the means of production just will never fly here and it’s not clear to me that’s a good idea anyway). But maybe we can take the best of socialism and repackage it in a way that’s palatable. Make it into a sort of socialism with American characteristics, as the Chinese might say. In alot of ways, it’s really just an updated version of the Progressive movement of the late 1800’s/early 1900’s.