• spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    No, no it is not accurate. At all. A toddler knows meaning behind words. Not too many words, but most toddlers understand there is connection outside of, “this other word likely follows this word”. LLMs do not. They have no concept of meaning. They have no concepts at all.

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      If you dig into what we know about human brains, you might find out we aren’t that different. We come up with words based on the previous words just like processing tokens.

      We may have a better model, and more advanced hard(wet)ware but it’s still very much a predictive process based on context.

      • spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        lol no, no there is no equivalence between associating words with actual things and deriving further words, and calculating the likelihood of words appearing after other words. At all.

        • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          ah, Clearly you have the superior brain. Smarter than all the doctors who study this shit.

          Good for you, I hope you get the Nobel Prize for Medicine for enlightening the world on how the human brain actually works.

          • spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            lol

            I speak knowing more than you. I’m also talking about “AI”. You bet your ass I know more about LLMs and other types of “AI” than the vast majority of doctors, including those with doctorates in computer science.