Crossposted from https://thebrainbin.org/m/[email protected]/t/1945027
A small town in eastern Germany banned the installation of new Holocaust memorial plaques that mark the last known residence or workplace of Jews and other victims of the genocide.
The motion was proposed by the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) and the centre-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU)…



Cheers, but that doesn’t resolve the contradiction.
Case 1: Sloan’s example
Athenian citizens had democracy; non-citizens didn’t.
Two separate groups: no contradiction. (Partial suffrage, as opp. universal suffrage.)
Case 2: OurToothbrush
“a proletarian democracy under dictatorship of the proletariat”.
Same group (“proletarians”), so there is contradiction.
no, in the dictatorship of the proletariat the majority of people, this means the working class, imposes a dictatorship upon the bourgeoisie, the minority group that lives by stealing other people’s work.
So, not a democracy then.
didn’t you just read about it? it’s a democracy for us, its a dictatorship for you nazi trash. we’ll be ruling over the oppressors. of course you disagree with that because you’re a fascist.
You: The dictatorship of the proletariat is a dictatorship. Me: So, not a democracy then. You: You are a fascist!
You’re scraping the bottom of Graham’s Hierarchy of Disagreement .
you’re scraping the bottom of my ass you dumb ass gringo
Me: You’re scraping the bottom of Graham’s Hierarchy of Disagreement. You: You dumb ass gringo.
I rest my case.
vos: soy un gringo boludo yo: sos un gringo re pelotudo
algo.
I’m flattered by your insistence on proving my point.
Considering how you’re replying to people like this over those actually refuting your arguments/attempting to help you learn things you refuse to hear, I think you’re the one doing the majority of scraping in these threads.
Ridiculous. Go back to Reddit. Capitalist “democracies” are objectively not democratic, but you claim they are without evidence, and also without defining your term: democracy. Athens had slaves, like the US used to, and still does under the 14th amendment, yet you call them democracies. Clean your room.
I’m gonna say this is a bit, cuz saying you have the memory of a goldfish isn’t nice. In which case, I actually did find it amusing.
There basically has never yet been a democracy for all residents of a state. The purpose of the state is to impose the will of the ruling class upon the other classes.
Bourgeois democracy is a democracy for the bourgeoisie, to the exclusion of the proletariat.
Proletarian democracy is a democracy for the proletariat, to the exclusion of the bourgeoisie.
Until capitalism/imperialism has been nearly universally phased out, there will be competing economic classes. Once capitalism is gone, there will only be one economic class, the proletariat, allowing democracy to finally be for everyone. That’s what Marxists mean by a “stateless” society: one that is classless.
Previously:
As you have already chosen to remain ignorant by blocking me, this is for the peanut gallery.
A citizen democracy under dicatorship of the citizen. The citizen made up the dictatorship
Somehow always remind me when people mention Athenian democracy
Removed by mod
The athenian citizens had a democracy under the male-citizen dictatorship. You are just using a different definition of dictatorship than the one that is used for “dictatorship of the proletariat”
They also had slaves.