• mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    if it looks like a goat, and acts like a goat, it’s a goat.

    Logic like this is why people used to consider mammals like dolphins and beavers as fish. Stop it.

    • blind3rdeye@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      “fish” is perhaps a bad example to make your point with, given that that’s a non-technical term that doesn’t refer to any particular genetic branch of the animal kingdom - hence the podcast “no such thing as a fish”. So I’d say that calling a mountain goat a goat is supported by the idea that many unrelated animals are called fish.

    • schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Doplphins and beavers don’t act or look like fish to me. Dolphins maybe I could understand if you were an ancient person who lived inland, but beavers?

      But I guess part of crowdsourcing is that you get some really stupid people on the project.

    • GreenBean@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Some communities and parishes in the St Louis , MO area still recognize a 17th century French Catholic decision that, as aquatic animals, Beaver fall inside the dispensation that “fish” is acceptable for consumption on Fridays. Soooo, no matter its appearance, it is kinda fish?