“Oh you pointed out that voting for democrats is worse than nothing? Well better immediately organize a violent revolution, otherwise your argument is moot!”
You are aware there’s other things a person can do than vote or immediately lead a proletarian uprising, right? You understand how disingenuous a proposition it is you are making, right?
There really is no reason to only do one of them.
Following your line of argument there is no reason to vote.
How has changing parties 3 times in a quarter millennia stopped them from getting where they are now?
Wow, its almost like electorialism is a fundamentally broken tool that does not allow you to change the system!
How is what you are arguing not an argument against voting?
Then revolt AND vote at the same time.
There really is no reason to only do one of them.
“Oh you pointed out that voting for democrats is worse than nothing? Well better immediately organize a violent revolution, otherwise your argument is moot!”
You are aware there’s other things a person can do than vote or immediately lead a proletarian uprising, right? You understand how disingenuous a proposition it is you are making, right?
Following your line of argument there is no reason to vote.