Mickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agoReligions have some of the wackiest ruleslemmy.worldimagemessage-square137linkfedilinkarrow-up1954
arrow-up1954imageReligions have some of the wackiest ruleslemmy.worldMickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square137linkfedilink
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·1 year agoThey are clearly not talking about the legitimate, medically necessary cases
minus-squareLeroyJenkins@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agonot really… they said any. they didn’t give any indication they might have an exception to that. sounds like they’re talking about a blanket ban.
minus-squareZwiebel@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI’ve never heard of any circumcision opponent being against medically neccesary procedures. Only supporters using it as a bad faith argument
They are clearly not talking about the legitimate, medically necessary cases
not really… they said any. they didn’t give any indication they might have an exception to that. sounds like they’re talking about a blanket ban.
I’ve never heard of any circumcision opponent being against medically neccesary procedures. Only supporters using it as a bad faith argument