• ggppjj@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    This isn’t about Flathub. The problem is that Fedora has their own flatpak repo and the packages there take priority over the properly-maintained ones in FlatHub, per OBS.

    Not that what you’ve mentioned is wrong, but in this comment section that’s a different topic than what we’re discussing.

    • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Why did Fedora make their packages take priority? Is it because the priority is otherwise random and if you don’t have a priority set, that leads to the issue they mentioned? Because if so, that sounds like a reasonable action by Fedora and like the real culprit is Flathub.

      • ggppjj@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        They put their repo first on the list. Packages will default to Fedora’s repo if available. You may specify which version you want, if you both know that it’s happening and know that the package you want in particular is available at both.

        I really again do not know how this could possibly be the fault of another repository. Fedora is making decisions for ther distro that circumvent FlatHub, this is not FlatHub’s fault.