weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agoMulti-track driftingsub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square25linkfedilinkarrow-up1701
arrow-up1701imageMulti-track driftingsub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square25linkfedilink
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoexactly why private ownership is morally better, no shareholders to expect reasons for actions
minus-squareEmpricorn@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 year agoDo you think an obscenely wealthy individual owner vs a publicly-traded company owned by a group of them solves the fundamental issue?
minus-squarejumping redditor [they/them]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agomakes it more of the owner’s personal choice, rather than having to come up with a justification to the shareholders.
minus-squaresfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoBut that’s good because wealth and power aren’t known to corrupt and change people right?
exactly why private ownership is morally better, no shareholders to expect reasons for actions
Do you think an obscenely wealthy individual owner vs a publicly-traded company owned by a group of them solves the fundamental issue?
makes it more of the owner’s personal choice, rather than having to come up with a justification to the shareholders.
But that’s good because wealth and power aren’t known to corrupt and change people right?