Hofmaimaier@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 27 days agoNo rational person would do this...feddit.orgimagemessage-square19linkfedilinkarrow-up1493
arrow-up1493imageNo rational person would do this...feddit.orgHofmaimaier@feddit.org to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 27 days agomessage-square19linkfedilink
minus-squareMrNesser@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up33·edit-227 days agoI disagree π is the most rational number you could ever put. It encompasses every other possible number combination you could ever think of. Now putting something like 42 that’s just nonsense
minus-squareentwine413@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up34·27 days ago It encompasses every other possible number combination you could ever think of. Allegedly.
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5·26 days agoPi doesn’t contain a 109999999999 long string of (uninterrupted) 1s. You can verify it.
minus-squareyetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·24 days agoTry to find it - you won’t succeed. Therefore it doesn’t exist. ◻
minus-squareSippyCup@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·27 days agoπ is the only rational number in base π. Also every base is base 10.
minus-squarecley_faye@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·27 days agoI’m going to use base π from time to time.
minus-squareLucy :3@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·24 days agoThe ultime “all numbers” formula is still \d+
I disagree π is the most rational number you could ever put.
It encompasses every other possible number combination you could ever think of.
Now putting something like 42 that’s just nonsense
Allegedly.
Eh prove me wrong
That would be irrational of me
Touche good sir
That would take forever
Pi doesn’t contain a 109999999999 long string of (uninterrupted) 1s.
You can verify it.
How?
Try to find it - you won’t succeed.
Therefore it doesn’t exist.
◻
the burden of proof is on you
π is the only rational number in base π.
Also every base is base 10.
I’m going to use base π from time to time.
The ultime “all numbers” formula is still \d+