Multiple of your fractional subsets don’t apply. It doesn’t have to be a woman, doesn’t need to be a “relationship” as typically meant by the term, and didn’t hinge on some strange inability to “independently shop for groceries”.
No. You have a very strangely rigid concept of what pieces are actually required for the joke here. A person who is usually on their phone is difficult to contact. The “joke” is the disconnect between a person being apparently on their phone at all times and being unable to contact them yourself when needing to. That’s literally it. Every other detail is just window dressing.
Multiple of your fractional subsets don’t apply. It doesn’t have to be a woman, doesn’t need to be a “relationship” as typically meant by the term, and didn’t hinge on some strange inability to “independently shop for groceries”.
Ok, then a person who uses “her” as a pronoun rather than exclusively a woman.
All other criteria are essential to meet the apparent meaning of the joke.
No. You have a very strangely rigid concept of what pieces are actually required for the joke here. A person who is usually on their phone is difficult to contact. The “joke” is the disconnect between a person being apparently on their phone at all times and being unable to contact them yourself when needing to. That’s literally it. Every other detail is just window dressing.
I understood that much. Take it up with [email protected] for what their interpretation requires.
The set dressing either should have been communicated clearer to not be confusing or wholly omitted.