God I wish I could completely deny internet access to some of my apps on stock android. It’s obvious why they don’t allow it though.

That would definitely be better.

For people who have not read the article:

Forbes states that there is no indication that this app can or will “phone home”.

Its stated use is for other apps to scan an image they have access to find out what kind of thing it is (known as "classification"). For example, to find out if the picture you’ve been sent is a dick-pick so the app can blur it.

My understanding is that, if this is implemented correctly (a big ‘if’) this can be completely safe.

Apps requesting classification could be limited to only classifying files that they already have access to. Remember that android has a concept of “scoped storage” nowadays that let you restrict folder access. If this is the case, well it’s no less safe than not having SafetyCore at all. It just saves you space as companies like Signal, WhatsApp etc. no longer need to train and ship their own machine learning models inside their apps, as it becomes a common library / API any app can use.

It could, of course, if implemented incorrectly, allow apps to snoop without asking for file access. I don’t know enough to say.

Besides, you think that Google isn’t already scanning for things like CSAM? It’s been confirmed to be done on platforms like Google Photos well before SafetyCore was introduced, though I’ve not seen anything about it being done on devices yet (correct me if I’m wrong).

I couldn’t actually believe this article was real. Figured it was a comedic post like that previous one about switching to Cyrillic letters in the US .

A Little Person on Lemmy! Woo! Go representation!

But also, does this sort of thing happen to you often, as an LP with a regular boyfriend? Just curious.

They hear, but do they really listen?

We keep telling them our great ideas but all they do is put us on lists!