• 1 Post
  • 11 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 8th, 2023

help-circle

  • Banning TP-Link routers isn’t going to do a damn thing to solve the problem of insecure routers, SOHO or otherwise. Too many people and companies set shit up and then ignore it until it breaks and under these conditions routers are always going to become insecure given a long enough timeline.

    Fire up Shodan and see how many discontinued Cisco ASAs are out there. Hell you can probably still find some Cisco PIX boxes even though they went away nearly twenty years ago! Those aren’t people doing that, those are COMPANIES.

    The problem here isn’t the brand or even the silicon that brand uses. It’s with the utter lack of management (including EoL replacement) by the people using the damn things.


  • I’m curious how that funding worked.

    In Texas in order to work government event security and do fill-in work you need to be a sworn Peace Officer in the state but in order to be a sworn officer you need to be employed by a recognized Law Enforcement Agency in the State.

    So most of those Officers were only minimally present on the Duty Roster, primarily only working when another agency put out a call for Officers.

    That much I know from researching it back when it was a current event. I suspect that this was primarily funded by the Officers involved paying into the scheme as they got work. As an example Officer Humpty would work an event in Dallas and the Coffee City P.D. would get paid $3,000 (pick a number) for borrowing that Officer. Coffee City would then pay Officer Humpty $2,000 (pick a number) for his work.

    You could easily keep 200+ Officers busy doing events and fill-in work in Texas.

    You should also know that the Coffee City, P.D. was a refuge for troubled Peace Officers, a sort of “Last Chance University” for Texas Cops. They’d get in trouble somewhere else then go to Coffee City and work there to prove that they were fine and then transfer back to a regular Police Department somewhere else.

    They’d put up with the bullshit so that they could hold onto their career in Law Enforcement.







  • They aren’t imbeciles. They are pursuing their objectives in ways that are inconsistent with US Law and tradition and when they run into trouble they obfuscate as much as possible to forestall the consequences.

    As an example read the court filing from Joshua Fisher (pdf warning). If you read 3 & 4 carefully you’ll come to the understanding that Musk is a SGE of the WHO with the Job Title “Senior Advisor”.

    Then you run into #6 where the text turns itself inside out trying to explain that the US DOGE Service Temporary Organization is under the umbrella of the US DOGE Service which is separate from the White House Office (that employs Musk) but the US DOGE Service is still a component of the Executive…which Musk works for.

    Once you are done bending your noggin’ around all of that you are probably too tired and confused to ask the most important question. If Musk isn’t in charge of DOGE then who is?

    We all know it’s Musk but they can’t say that nor can answer the question with someone else’s name because then the jig would be up and they’d be hosed. They need it to be Musk for popularity reasons but they also need it to not be anyone at all so that no one can be held responsible.

    They know what they’re doing. Don’t assume for a single second that they don’t. You aren’t seeing stupidity, at least not on this, you are seeing methodical, planned, and deliberate attempts to confuse the issue in order to escape consequences and oversight.