The US is only such a powerhouse, because they generally have the support of their allies. That makes it the unparalleled biggest economic block in the world.
But without their allies, USA isn’t that much stronger than China economically. And USA wouldn’t be nearly the powerhouse they’ve gotten used to be.
So China just has to look on and do nothing, while USA is losing their world dominance quickly.
Maybe I’m wrong, but as I read the article, Linus isn’t convinced this is a good idea either.
I’m not saying things can never change, but opening for a mixed code base is a recipe for disaster.
That seems brutal, will they ever recover?
That does NOT sound like a good idea.
We’ve turned our development model into a well-oiled engineering marvel,
Exactly, and I’m pretty sure one of the reasons is that it’s remained on C, and NOT switched to C++, as has been often suggested.
The second they make it a mixed code base, that’s the same second quality will deteriorate. Mixed code base is a recipe for disaster.
Edit:
Torvalds eventually responded by defending the Linux kernel development process and scolding Martin for grandstanding on social media about the issue. Martin later quit as a Linux maintainer and resigned from the Asahi Linux project.
Seems like Linus isn’t onboard with this.
But I guess all the downvoters know better?
opening for a mixed code base is a recipe for disaster.
Greg Kroah-Hartman:
Yes, mixed language codebases are rough, and hard to maintain, but we are kernel developers, dammit.
That’s special pleading, that lacks basis in reality. Still he admits it’s rough to mix codebases.
I’m not claiming Rust wouldn’t be brilliant in some situations, but the detraction of a mixed codebase is worse than the benefit.
They were slammed!!! Oh boy that’s rough. I hope they weren’t slammed too hard. /s
I think the word they were looking for may have been “criticized” or something like that?
This should be obvious, but poor people are just too stupid to figure out even the simplest things.
/s
death threats against Musk.
STOP THREATENING!!!
Half the military is probably MAGA, military persons tend to like authoritarian leaders.
So don’t bet on them as the last defense. It needs to be resolved BEFORE military becomes a factor.
but who the hell is going to step up and actually try to stop him?
To me it seems that there is no actual hard checks and balances, it’s all based on respecting norms, and anyone who doesn’t, that has control of the executive branch, will be very hard to stop.
But that’s what I’ve been warning USA about repeatedly for more than 20 years. USA is a dysfunctional democracy, the 2 party system undermines democracy. Everybody has known that since the constitution was written, but Americans wanted that because they imagine this system to be more “efficient” at making “strong” decisions.
Maybe so, but if it’s at the cost of democracy, those decisions are very likely not good decisions.
I think we can safely say that the US government has failed the people for decades, despite being richer, when you compare to the superior rights and freedoms and quality of life in Europe.
As an absolute fan of USA in the 70’s when I was young, the decline of American society over the past 50 years has been a sad sight.
Everything changed when Reagan was elected over Carter, and the humanist ideal have never come back.
how close is the United States to a constitutional crisis: Are we headed toward one, on the brink, or already there?
Since Trump has already declared that only the President can interpret the law, I’d say USA is already there.
Also the administration is taking over offices that are supposed to be controlled by congress.
Finally, the illegal intervention and control extended to Elon Musk where he has has lifted information also illegally, and has CLEAR conflicts of interest, is enough by itself.
So IMO USA is already there on several counts.
Trump is a fascist, and he is REALLY trying to create a totalitarian state this time, and it’s evident to have been planned beforehand.
PS: This alone too is a constitutional crisis:
https://thesource.com/2025/02/19/king-trump-official-white-house-social-media-page-sends-long-live-the-king-message/
To declare himself King, might seem like just in bad taste, but it’s actually what he see himself as, and he won’t stop until he has absolute control.
It’s also unconstitutional because Kings are above the law, and the constitution says nobody is above the law.
So the constitutional crises began already BEFORE Trump was president, when a hijacked supreme court declared the President to actually be above the law. (as long as it’s a republican)
PS: Quote from the constitution Section 9 clause 8:
No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States.
Understaffed IRS benefit the rich the most, because those are the most difficult to go after, because they use expensive lawyers.
The average guy however, can only bend over and take it. So they are always targeted first!!!
I didn’t know that, but yes, it would probably seem confusing to use different terminologies for essentially the same thing.
Yes of course, bi-fold rolls equally well. 👍
OK I’m onboard with that. 🍻
Oh it’s the economy is it? That’s the biggest problem with Trump?
It’s not about him undermining democracy from day 1?
Or the fact that he is internationally despised for his incompetence and acting like an elephant in a China store.
There were lots of warnings that Trumps policies would hurt the economy. If you voted for Trump, you got exactly what you voted for!!!
I’d agree if you had written any story about Trump or “him”. But I’m not quite sure what “this” is?
If you claim any story about Ukraine is about money I strongly disagree.
Although dubbed a trifold, the phone has three mini-panels and folds only twice.
It’s three elements that can fold together.
It’s probably called tri- because it rolls better on the tongue than dual or double fold.
But goddam €3.499m,- is a steep price, especially considering there were initial reports of quite serious problems with it.
Are you acting stupid on purpose? There are many ways to extend a contract, this would be an extension to the new company, do you think things can only be extended in time?
Also an extended contract doesn’t have to be the literal same contract, but can be a new contract that replaces the old one, but with extra things added.
No not really, I said license agreements they’ve received from other companies. That’s just ONE VERY SPECIFIC form of contract, not contracts in general.
Obviously if both parties agree, they can extend the contract to the new company without problem.
How does that confuse you?
To be fair, in the last frame dad is not pretending.