These violent delights have violent ends

Or maybe just play a laugh track right after they finished?

Agreed, the AI doesn’t even respond in first person.

I figured it might be an extremely hard to get reference, as the people understanding soccer/football references in a owl community on a IT dominated plattform will be far and few between.

But props to you for doing the research to understand a silly football pun on an owl’s name. (I added alt text to the gif, did that help you in your research?)

I was trying to get you to question the believe that lazyness is an evolutionary trait. Like the post you replied to said: Find the root cause of your lazyness.

Because it’s almost always not an evolutionary trait, it’s avoiding negative emotions. As you said: Doing dishes (bad) -> do nothing (good) But, with boredom, this would result in this: Doing dishes (bad) -> do nothing (good) -> boredom (bad)

Thus, we get negative emotions again. But we can avoid the final negative emotions by lying on the couch and spending energy looking at a screen. And our chain looks like this: Doing dishes (bad) -> looking at screen (good)

Because being bored is hard. If you want to see how hard it is, decide to just stare at a blank wall for the next 30min-1h instead and watch your brain fight this decision as hard as it can.

Thus saying “I’m lazy” and “being lazy is an evolutionary trait” results in “I can’t do anything about me being lazy”. And that is an easy way to avoid having to face and work through those negative emotions.

So then, which stimuli do you get and don’t get that make you lazy and, for example, stop you from doing the dishes?

If lazyness is an evolutionary trait to conserve energy, why do we get bored (pushing us to spend energy) once we do so?

Starts printing Anti-Authorities

The printing press