Thanks for the recommendation, I’ll give it a try!

Sadly not, I’d also be interested in one!

I very much dislike Mozilla’s direction over the last decade. They’re introducing user-hostile features that subtly break normal browsing experience, even when disabled[0]. Not like Google is better, but I’m also trying to get away from Mozilla.

[0] On Firefox Mobile, there’s a “feature” which makes the address bar auto-complete domains of companies paying Mozilla. I noticed this with Netflix - I never visit, but when I start writing a URL with n, roughly every 10th time Netflix was suggested. You can disable this feature, but this doesn’t actually disable it. The address bar no longer auto-completes with Netflix, instead it just doesn’t autocomplete! So 9/10 times I can write n and press Enter, but 1/10 times I press n and search for the letter n.

Mozilla doesn’t care whether they break features, as long as they can make more money. I strongly dislike this approach by the supposedly “good” browser manufacturer.

Reverse John Wick

Bond fights through a horde of henchmen to brutally murder a puppy

Why is Donna Shellstrop sitting next to him?

Depends. In this scenario, how Welsh am I?

Just like the ocean is the best body of water for children who want to learn about swimming

Not if they’re being prevented from showing to be better by C devs who, literally, “will do everything [they] can do to stop this”.

Nobody is trying to unseat 30 years of C.

If Rust is going to happen, then it’ll happen.

How can it happen if individual maintainers say they’ll do everything in their power to keep Rust out of the kernel? There’s fundamentally no way forward. The R4L devs already gave every commitment they could, but some maintainers fundamentally don’t want it.

And before anyone brings it up: no, the maintainers weren’t asked to touch Rust code or not break Rust code or anything else.