I’m talking about total polution of an item per country (or region)'s population - counted like kgCO2 / kg produce / person.

Emissions per capita would be interesting

This would actually be useful for local testing of software during development.

I like the take in Phantom of the Opera better here. At first you expect it to be a beauty and the beast romantic story but Christine rejects the phantom not because of his appearance but because his soul is just as ugly as his exterior.

Except capital income can be hidden in other countries, still giving an unfair advantage to the super rich.

More wankers every year.

Only the people living there can invite a vampire in.

The surface area increases if you flatten something out while maintaining the volume.

The bumper is usually made of plastic. If you had to put bumper sticker on the car, the bumper is a very good choice.

Ctrl+r in any terminal will open up a search mode for your history.

Soon they may come with cellular capacity. Cars and e-bikes already do.

You gotta Faraday cage it!

I prefer quotes to be as close to the original as possible. Hurtful as it is. That’s kind of the point here.

Censoring the bad shit that happened before is a sure way to repeat it. See holocaust denial for the extreme. Don’t deny talking about the past just because it hurts.

No but then the argument above falls flat, doesn’t it?

You are obviously not interested in listening to a word I’m saying. Goodbye.

Alternatively, we need to stop saying E2EE is safe at all, for any type of data, because or the arbitrary usage.

You probably didn’t understand me. I’m saying that a company can just arbitrarily decide (like you did) that the server is the “end” recipient (which I disagree with). That can be done for chat messages too.

You send the message “E2EE” to the server, to be stored there (like a file, unencrypted), so that the recipient(s) can - sometime in the future - fetch the message, which would be encrypted again, only during transport. This fully fits your definition for the cloud storage example.

By changing the recipient “end”, we can arbitrarily decode the message then.

I would argue that the cloud provider is not the recipient of files uploaded there. In the same way a chat message meant for someone else is not meant for the server to read, even if it happens to be stored there.

Uhh yes, sorry. I had it the other way around. Perhaps a native american then raped/had child with a caucasian, who kept the child?

The third paragraph contradicts your other point. You define E2EE in two wildly different ways.

The chat messages are most likely stored on an intermediary server, which would qualify for the same loophole you pointed out in the cloud storage example.

No, the other ancestors are all native American. Obviously the child stayed in the native to community.

They turn into special mushrooms.