

6·
4 months agoThank you for explaining! I agree with OP, that does sound super annoying for the end user. Trademark law can go fuck itself though.


Thank you for explaining! I agree with OP, that does sound super annoying for the end user. Trademark law can go fuck itself though.


I think I don’t get you comment. Whom do you refer to with ‘They’? The French government is switching over to Visio, as per the article.
Okay, buddy elementary school
nowadays via 9gag.com Humorous.
While ‘pdf24’ sounds like some cheap knock off software, it’s actually an incredible open source tool that can do most pdf editing you might want to do.
There is no paid version.
I think this is a very short-sighted, surface level take that shows of a very naive understanding of how societies become more totalitarian.
I laughed, my dude.
Hey dash! Cool article on an issue worth writing about. Thank you for sharing your own work here.
I have a question about something that surprised me: did you consider censoring user names of the people you used as examples of negative internet culture? From a perspective of journalistic best practice, I personally feel like this would have been better, mostly since you are making a point about general culture, not specific people. This became noticable to me with the reference to mastodon (less with reddit). Maybe because mastodon feels like more of a personal, less anonymous platform. Also, @f… (no thank you voyager, I won’t tag him here, even if you autocomplete the handle) is more singled out.
What I want to express is that I feel like that not censoring names detracts from your point of ‘online spaces are bad’ to ‘these people are bad’. This is especially true if the bad actor is a single person, as in the mastodon / ‘shut up about instagram’-section. This is the case in addition to the risk of people reaching out to the posters in question to worsen their day.