Not necessarily: pretty sure people might argue that saying princesses are just for girls, for example, is sexist, but not misogynistic. Depends on the context ig. In the quote above, putting them together is about emphasis on the negative more than anything, so it does serve some purpose, even if the meaning is similar

Thanks. And Again, someone wrote the dictionary. That doesn’t mean we have to agree with their definition — it may be the ‘accepted’ one (not sure by who), but I guess you get what I mean.

Sounds like something off a spurlock doc. If true, What a sorry state of affairs.

Yeah, probably not enough to burn through 26 grams of sugar (maybe more depending on what they eat for lunch/how many tins of the terrible stuff they have before or after school)

I presume you’re not a fan of sugar cubes then in favour of a spoon?

I agree mostly, But I do think it’s gratuitous of people to say ‘by definition’ because who gets to set the definition? The definition of something like sport is not an indefatigable universal truth, it’s only coz some bloke somewhere in history said ‘this is the definition of sport’ and some other people went along with it, but we can make definitions also. Thats why I don’t agree with people who say ‘it’s a sport and you have to call it a sport coz others say it is’ (I don’t mean you by that, but the people en masse.) My point is: the definition of sport, whether corporations like it or not, is a matter of opinion/personal preference. Anyone can call what they want a sport or not personally to them if they decide so. We shouldn’t care about the ‘definition’, unless you agree with that particular definition. What I’m saying is, have your own mind.

Well, everyone has their own view on what is a sport and what isn’t. Your view is perfectly fine for yourself, just as mine is perfectly fine for me. You say it’s a sport, I say it’s not. It’s simply a matter of opinion/preference

What… the hell… has happened… to my comments section???

Whenever anyone says ‘cup-a-soup’ it makes me think of this weird Australian advert that they broadcast in the uk c.2005-6 for some reason

Only if you drink 100ml though. I believe a standard can had 2-3 times that amount

Well let’s have a look at the quantities of caffeine and Turaine of red bull and compare, shall we? Here, have a look at this: https://www.redbull.com/us-en/energydrink/products/red-bull-energy-drink-ingredients-list

Possibly two different people rounded it differently.

I just got the stats off this page on their website

Yeah it’s not good when big companies like that make such misleading comparisons

He could be

From both ends

Ah fair enough lol

Not sexist misogynist ones

I don’t disagree to be fair. Doesn’t mean I can’t still shit all over it. This is shitposts after all. Also, it’s not solely much a pure jab at Dunkin’ (not alone anyway) but at people’s copious consumption of junk food also. Just sayin’…

That’s not even the worst thing: his first image that he posted had a Frappuccino labelled as ‘mountain dew’ not a joke

This comment made my shit night

Actually, I believe I know it despite not living in America: isn’t it 29 grams of sugar for a large?