Because scrapping existing things just because they’re not a throwback to the old gas guzzler days is surely going to save money and make things great again.
I’m kind of waiting for him to throw out a maximum fuel efficiency standard. You know, get them back to the good ol days of the 1970s 8/mpg Lincoln that weigh 2 tons.
Pride disinvited them after their pullback, and there has been plenty of chatter of people moving to Costco. Recent CNN piece talks about it as well.
So wait a damn minute here. Target, a MN company, had (past tense) an expansive DEI program that they recently scrapped following along with the trend from multiple other outfits.
Unlike many other places the public actually got mobilized in some level to show they’re pissed off at Target for ditching the program and refusing to shop there.
NOW the FL attorney general decided they should try and file a suit against them for being ‘woke’?
What kind of backwards response is that? It hardly even makes sense from a political theater perspective much less in any practical way. Fascists, still unable to find their own ass with both hands and a flashlight…
Edit: It occured to me that as conspiratorial as it sounds it’s possible Target begged for this treatment to try and gain some sympathy points for being picked on by the big bad far right. Give the people someone else they already hate to point at and maybe some ‘forget’ that you the company just gave a big FU to a sizable portion of your customers/employees/suppliers.
In the simplest sense, a separation of duties. If the judge was to be the sole decider of what is worth consideration then you have this individual functioning as an unquestioned king.
No single person is going to know every case, consider every angle, and have an inclination to pursue all points of view. Even the supreme court receives amicus briefs to guide a case.
An attorney has a duty to get the best possible outcome for their client, even if they disagree with what the client may have done. A single person judiciary could never have that position because they are effectively advocating both sides to themselves.
I was actually hoping to see that as a defense. The principal thing that copy enforcement corps always cite is ‘we downloaded a copy from their IP, thus they made a copy and distributed the work’.
If this works as a defense here then in effect they make direct download portals legal for the users at least.
Somehow advanced quantum computing ends up with a steampunk aesthetic.
I could see two significant problems here.
1: people getting lazy and just chucking everything into the generic bucket and the admins/global mods having a mess to deal with.
2: I’m the event of an ability to move content to another community other than the instance ‘global’ how do you deal with cross-instance moves? For example if the most prominent version of a comm is on one instance but a post gets put on another, the logical place would be to be on the more prominent community, but just dumping posts on another instance isn’t going to be well received I would guess.
Got to wonder what some lawyer told them was going have them bent over to suddenly say Musk is just an advisor with no authority and try and erase things like this. I’m guessing we find out soon enough while Donnie tries to scramble to gaslight everyone about what he said before.
This user particularly has been a lot of them that I’ve seen.
I can feel the Facebook oozing through this post
Which is exactly why he stuck himself in there.