data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9795/f979552c9f007baba354567495c48f295e7a19f7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a913/1a913d4611443135192a6358b150e717cafe8938" alt=""
Is your sister trying to tell you something?
Just looking at that is making my mouth dry.
Is your sister trying to tell you something?
Just looking at that is making my mouth dry.
Pretending that it’s less broken than it is isn’t more constructive.
What makes you think it ever did?
If only there were some way to “redeam” yourself.
Even jargon can be found in a dictionary.
Do they just use the good ones in new models now?
What’s the deal with the hinge upgrade?
Wait, who’s the second president? Musk and … ?
“imflammable” is not a word.
That’s an example of not fixing something that is broken.
I thought we were already well past that point.
Shut the fuck up, Tim Noel.
By that logic, it would impossible to report on literally anything.
The main problem is that Rust is immature. It’s still evolving, and the unreliable compiler slowly generates bloated binaries.
It’s a great idea, and it will get there, but shoving something incomplete into the mainline Linux kernel isn’t the way to start.
A Rust-only fork, on the other hand, would do much more to test and prove Rust’s utility in such a space.
Snark isn’t the same as capitulation; arguably, the opposite.
Or it means someone in Europe did, since this is from a European office.
This article is from the UK and is about European countries
Correction: we now have a king
Better winterize it first