Brain damage changes peoples brains.
It could make them conservative, progressive, childlike, homicidal, happy, sad, robotic, face blind, mute, aphantasic. All sorts of things.
Brain damage ≠ conservative automatically.

What‽
I can’t tell if this is a stupid question. It isn’t even a coherent sentence.
What are you asking?

That depends on you’re argument.
How do you think his case applies to you yours.

I don’t see any similarities other than the number 34.

ABOVE the 250k level is what they aren’t LEGALLY required to cover.

Yes that’s just reiterating what I literally said originally.

There aren’t different tiers of FDIC insurance. The banks aren’t choosing to paying for extra coverage. The FDIC is a federal program. Yes the banks pay into it. It’s required by law that they do. But the FDIC decides on it’s own if it will cover more than $250k. And they have, for every bank collapse, no matter the size, at least since the late 90s.

The banks and credit unions aren’t the one’s covering the deposits. FDIC is for when the bank itself fails, when they can’t cover their customer’s deposits.

And yes it happens all the time for regional banks and credit unions. SVB was news only because they’re an odly large and important regional bank. But they were treated by FDIC like any other. No depositor at any retail bank in the US has lost their money due to a bank failure in 20+ years.

While that is what they’re legally required to insure. The reality is that even people with 10s of millions get fully covered. The FDIC has been covering 100% of retail bank accounts for a couple decades.

Most recently when the Silicon Valley Bank collapsed, accounts with over $60M were fully covered.

I used it for almost a year.
It took me ~2 months to find, understand, and tweak settings until I stopped running into issues with sites at least one every couple weeks.

I understand what you were asking for. People ask for what they imagine. What they can imagine isn’t always what they want. Sometimes an entirely different idea can work better than they imagined.

By what you wrote, you want to be able to access Facebook and Instagram anonymously. The essayist most reliable way to do that is with a disposable account. Work around sites aren’t all that reliable. They work for a time then get swatted down, or limited in some way.

I made my Instagram account several years ago. I think I posted a couple photos at the beginning, now that I’m thinking of it.
Try generating 2-3 random AI images and posting them. Just to establish the account at the beginning.

It also makes sense that they’re more strict now. It may not work anyway.

I just made a dummy account. No posts no follows. I only use for occasional links people send me.

And it breaks sooo many sites.
Waterfox, is Firefox that just works.

If you intentionally obscure a feature, people won’t use it.
If you make it the default, they will.

Seems typical. But we can’t know without total traffic numbers to compare to. Is that 12k out of 1m, 100k, 20k?

You need total vehicle numbers for this to start meaning anything.

Yah. It had customizations nobody has anymore.

It wasn’t locked down. I rooted it, installed a few OS’s, it even ran Linux.

I understand the point of the article. I’m saying since the very beginning, the only limits on what smartphones can do, have been what software ‘they’ want you to run.

A CPU is a CPU. Some are faster or slower, but they can all do anything.

They have been since the beginning.
That’s literally why I got an OG Motorola Droid. I said to myself “I can have a full computer in my pocket!”

Maybe you are

There is a lot of social pressure to lie to kids especially.
I hate it.

Not all lawyers are trial lawyers. There are lots of things you can do helping people with paperwork of various kinds. EoL planing and incorporating businesses, for 2 examples off the top of my head.