It’s also not left wing architecture. It’s the cross roads of a left wing housing initiative, and a right wing refusal to spend money on the public good. What you get is something akin to unsecured prison architecture.

I remember loading up the old Doom a few years ago, and being upset the arrow keys didn’t work.

I thought WASD came well after that.

Exactly. You need more money to have that problem.
And like I said, they’re also exaggerating how much more money they need.

Because their money already fixed all the kinds of problems you have. They have new problems now. They’re also exaggerating those problems.

Every moment of every day, money solves peoples problems.
It’s kind of amazing how money realy is a problem solving superpower.

I don’t know where you are. But in the US or most of Europe it’s roughly the price a single lunch. A cheap fast food lunch. If you have a hard time affording fast food once a month, I get it. But I’d easily skip one meal a month for a better internet.

It’s not expensive. For the price of a single cheap lunch. Your main gateway to the internet is no longer trying to use you to make money from advertisers. It has the largest most capable feature set of any search provider. Again for the price of a single cheap lunch. It would be the last subscription I cancel.

It’s totally worth it. And you hit the major reason for me also. “Ranking” results is fantastic. And lenses, narrowing down results to academic sources is too useful anytime you want real info.

I started with the 300mo. I was able to keep under the limit without too much effort. But eventually I upgraded and it’s nice to not think about it anymore.

This article cites a meta study of 4 others.

Your saying they aren’t arrogant assholes?

Do people expect the price to go down?
I’m confused

A Dr. providing compassionate euthanasia assistance.

Hubris is un-earned arrogance. Or arrogance from ignorance.
Some people are appropriately arrogant. It’s annoying as fuck, but you can’t argue with their results.

People need to be okay paying for things online.

Communick is a paid fediverse provider.
I pay $30/year because I believe it’s worth paying for.

It makes sense for different servers to have different financing models. Ads I’m sure will have their place. But I imagine they won’t be popular.

Can you see me?
Which one am I?

NO TAXES!?!
I never said anything close to no taxes! I said the opposite of no taxes!

I said the purpose of taxes isn’t what people think it is.
Governments don’t need to take money so they have money to spend.

That doesn’t remotely mean I don’t want taxes, or taxes aren’t necessary.
Taxes are absolutely necessary!
Taxes are the flip side of government spending.

The government spends into the economy with one hand, and taxes out of the economy with the other hand. Taxes are the real inflation control.

99% of that is correct. That is exactly what governments do. You understand exactly what I’m saying also.

The one part that’s wrong is tiny, but absolutely foundational to what I’m saying,

What governments do, doesn’t necessarily correlate with how things work. What they do, and have done for centuries, could be wrong.

I’m arguing that it is wrong. I’m saying that everyone has been running their economies and making monetary policy decisions based on wrong ideas, since fiat currencies were invented.

No. Live traffic data is too much server overhead for an un-monetized service.
Also, someone would have to be tracking where everyone is.

I guess if you want to define the term that way, you can.
Seems an odd choice of phrase.

If you export something, you don’t have it domestically any more.
But this doesn’t work that way.

Diluting is a better term. But diluting isn’t exporting.

But still, that’s nothing to do with what I was saying.
Which is why I’m not sure you understood what I was saying.

Yah… That’s econ 101 stuff I’m not and haven’t been confused about that. Not sure how that’s ‘exporting’ inflation.

I don’t understand what you’re trying to say.
I’m not sure you understand what I’m trying to say.