That’s what he’s doing here.
Making sure Tesla gets to take advantage of the EV subsidies.

This is about paying bills.
Rumps agenda is going to end EV subsidies. Subsidies Tesla could use, maybe even needs. Without them Tesla could be in trouble, and by extension Musk would be.

Or would it be a community of first generation immigrants venting their frustrations with English itself?

That’s my kind of humor

Is everyone democrats in this observation?
I’m neither, for the record

And I neither said, nor acted like, she was telling the truth. Mearly pointing out that Rump is ignoring his own “intelligence”.

Look for Signage Displays. They’re basically TVs with different software.

Trumps own head of intelligence says they’re years away.

Newer devices have been designed and made in the decades since.
Are cars more sophisticated today then they were in the 1940s?

After world war two, Europe was busy putting itself back together. It left an opening that the US stepped into. And who wouldn’t like to be the big dog in the yard.

Ask them questions. Have them explain how, why. When you find contradictions or confusion, ask how they resolve them.

Only legally

That doesn’t address my comment at all.

One of them kind of is necessary.
If you don’t have some kind of “objective standard” to decide who gets a loan or not, you’re at the whims of the loan officer sitting in front of you; Including all the bias they (knowingly or not) bring to the table.

They’re a big step up from the previous alternative, that was rife with racism, abuse, and good-ole-boy advantage.

The it sounds like you should be arguing for different semantics. Ones that match the experience of living breathing human beings.

If they don’t, they’re still transitioning their gender. Exactly how much they decide to change themselves doesn’t matter. That’s the point of the term.

Gender isn’t biological. You’re conflating with sex

Depressingly, that would be a relative improvement.

Well damn then.
That’s extra depressing.

I’m pretty sure the cost of living numbers are for a household, not an individual.

So unless we’re looking to get back to single income households, the min wage should be divided by two.