

Email providers absolutely block other email providers who abuse their system.


Email providers absolutely block other email providers who abuse their system.


They could have always supported software for that long. They simply refused to.
There is no benefit to slowing the release cycle. All of the research gets done either way, all of the supply chain modifications get made either way, and as an individual you have no need to replace your phone every year. A multi-year release cycle does very little but screw over people who need a new phone during the wrong point in the release cycle, while also substantially complicating the supply chains by making demand much spikier.


That’s been my last couple weeks lol. I mostly read audiobooks, but I decided to buy a couple favorites just to have actual copies of for some reason or other and just didn’t stop.

They don’t have to sell or provide videos to third parties, because they can just do it themselves.
That’s the nature of actual federation. It’s not private.


I can’t imagine how bad of a student I would have been if “literally don’t do it” was a 65. That’s insane.


They didn’t even give him the 0 he deserved?


Facial recognition works better on white people because, mathematically, they provide more information in real world camera use cases.
Darker skin reflects less light and dark contrast is much more difficult for cameras to capture unless you have significantly higher end equipment.


Teach them how to evaluate sources on the internet.
Seriously, all the hardware/OS whatever is cool, but if you want to really make a difference that will affect everyone, teach them how to find information, how to evaluate it, and how to use internet reference material.


They should be doing the exact opposite and making it incredibly difficult not to open source it. Major platforms open sourcing much of their systems is basically the only good part of the AI space.


But in a separate Fortune editorial from earlier this month, Stanford computer science professor and AI expert Fei-Fei Liargued that the “well-meaning” legislation will “have significant unintended consequences, not just for California but for the entire country.”
The bill’s imposition of liability for the original developer of any modified model will “force developers to pull back and act defensively,” Li argued. This will limit the open-source sharing of AI weights and models, which will have a significant impact on academic research, she wrote.
Holy shit this is a fucking terrible idea.


Humping someone’s face isn’t speech.
It’s sexual assault.


As a default judgement because they don’t know who runs it lol.


I’d be interested in the form factor with like a raspberry pi in there.
Less powerful than that seems like a waste.


Gimp’s UX is a trainwreck. “Approachable tools” is the key bit there.
I don’t use photoshop. Fuck subscription horseshit. I use affinity. But Gimp having capability is fine, but it has a super high barrier to entry because the design is so bad.
Yeah, I really have no particular interest in taking my birthday off.