

I can usually tell someone is going to u-turn by the way they position their car. I.e. wide/to the right, often using the turning lane itself to get as much rotation as possible, and wheels turned sharply.
Do those things


I can usually tell someone is going to u-turn by the way they position their car. I.e. wide/to the right, often using the turning lane itself to get as much rotation as possible, and wheels turned sharply.
Do those things


Maybe they did it so no one else could? When patent trolls become the true heroes.


You can double block, but you can’t triple block. That’s the rule.


If you read this law bill in the strictest way, it makes almost no sense. It says that anyone who makes or controls an operating system has to check the age of every person who uses it. But it does not limit this to big companies. That could mean volunteers who help build Debian or even someone at home making their own version of Linux. The law bill would expect them to build a system that asks for (and verifies) a birthday before you can use the computer.
It gets even stranger with websites like GitHub. If someone downloads shared code and uses it, the person who posted it might be seen as responsible. But they have no way to know who downloaded it or what they did with it. The law bill would still expect their system to check ages and share that information with app makers.


deleted by creator


Problem is, that term implies these people had cognitive abilities in the first place.


“Please sign in.”


Well, I guess it’s technically installed software… but the scope is significantly less than what’s implied from the headline. My immediate reaction was, “how?”
This is basically standard browser fingerprinting, hence why it’s sold for surveillance activities. Linked in is big brother.


This isn’t even malicious compliance. It’s just compliance. The owner of the system can set ages for system users. Smart people will set it to what they want.


You know, I haven’t seen ICE in the news as much lately. What’s going on there?
Edit: n/m, found the answer: https://lemmy.ca/post/61489203
Arresting the reporters it seems


The only way this can be implemented at the OS level (not the vendor level) is to put in whatever date you want. That includes any notion of scanning “IDs”.
If you want to setup a kid’s account on a phone or pc, then you have the control. If they are smart enough to do it themselves, then hey- don’t hold them back.
My immediate concern is giving sites additional fingerprinting material. The OS better not give away an actual birthdate- when they can option for adult/not-adult, etc. Next concern is moving the age verification to a corporation, at which point the dystopia is real.


Easy, just create a long heat sink and dangle it in the earth’s atmosphere. Now we are winning!


deleted by creator


I’m going to drop my HBO sub and hope others do the same. The right is buying all the truth-telling media and shareholders need to feel this one deeply.


Doesn’t seem like this should be getting downvotes when traffic schools are spitting out drivers that don’t even know what the road signs mean. This is some [10 years ago] 20/20 worthy stuff.


For those who haven’t read the article, this is about background city noise, not sitting in traffic.


service is up the staff
Freudian slip?
So even the data centers are against him?