A ‘mode’ in emacs is a set of bindings which associate specific keys with specific functions.

Not quite, a mode is basically a lisp function defined with a different macro that integrates it into the various systems (like showing up in the modeline when active). It can do basically anything, including setting keybinds.

‘modes’ can be stacked on top of each other, with higher modes being able to intercept key presses before they reach lower modes, and changes / manipulate lower modes (I think?)

No, a keybind can only run one function and what that function is is whatever last defined a binding for that key. Like, if one mode defines a key to be something and you activate another that also binds that key, the latter takes over.

Emacs does have something like you describe, where functions can be ‘advised’.

Not really, Chrome has an overwhelming dominance on desktop despite not being preinstalled on any desktop operating system.

ABI stability?

All the data is stored in the nooki PDS. And there is one nooki PDS and can only be one PDS? Or can anyone make one?

Users have PDSes (Personal Data Server). Nookie wouldn’t have a PDS, it could have its own database but that’s not anything to do with the protocol.

The theory with ATProto is that user facing interfaces (App Views) write data directly to PDSes and then this data is aggregated by a giant index (Relays). This relay data is then consumed by those App Views that sort them into posts, replies, likes etc and presents it to the user as a usable interface to interact with.

That’s the high level gist, Bluesky is ridiculously over-engineered as it’s made by a bunch of cryptobros who wanted ‘social media but on the blockchain’ originally and this bleeds into the wider ATProto ecosystem.

I can’t speak for nookie, it could just be a basic centralised site that uses Bluesky as a sign-in mechanism. (That’d make sense given the apparent author prompted it here before and didn’t say it had any ATProto integration and it used to have the ability to create accounts).

Interestingly, the person who added these to Bluesky say they’re a bad idea: https://blue.mackuba.eu/skythread/?author=hailey.at&post=3m2mldbsmys2t

Of course, a hallmark of a decentralized network is that there is no central authority that could actually do that. Implicitly, this demand is a rejection of the very concept of decentralization.

What, you can absolutely ban people on a decentralised network. You may not be able to expunge someone from a part of the network they control themselves, but you can expunge them from the part you control. Bluesky has this power and has used it in the past.

“Are they wrong?” Rare counter example of Betteridge’s law of headlines.

Masto interprets a Note set as as:sensitive without a summary to mean ‘blur any media attached, but don’t collapse the text content’. I believe the same is true for non-Notes, but obviously without the summary = CW logic.

So a summary included in a non-Note is not CW’d by Mastodon currently.

I know, I was just saying that it prevents a non-Note from being CW’d, as the summery is used as the post’s content.

If it has a summary, I will use that as the content

But isn’t that how Mastodon handles content warnings? Baffling that they’d do it like that frankly given that it prevents long-form content (when masto actually starts supporting that) from being CW’d.

How they see it: https://sfba.social/@[email protected]/115267196743748430

Do note that Mastodon forces a redirect to the original instance for non-local posts, here’s a direct link to the comment: https://sfba.social/@karlauerbach/115267230182946226

It seems that threadiverse posts are being seen by more mastodon users now, which is great, but maybe the formatting could use some improvements?

There’s actually some related (yet-to-be-merged) changes to this on the Mastodon side, add support for links in Attachments (this is how Lemmy and the like federate links).

I don’t think anything’s changed, just two users finding a post in a hashtag (Lemmy adds the community name as a hastag for posts). I’ve seen some masto users complain about this in the past on the #lemmy tag.

It was a screenshot from the Indiana Jones game of Indy petting a cat saying “You don’t care much for these fascists, do you?” They captioned the screenshot with “good kitty”.

Right now blacksky.community is an app that uses Bluesky’s AppView, which in turn uses Bluesky’s Relay. They’re working on their own AppView (which will have the equivalent of local-only posts) and that will use their Relay.

Interesting, from what I understand of ATProto, this would be hard to do on protocol, it’ll be fascinating to see how they do it. Maybe something off protocol like the recent bookmark feature Bluesky got.

I didn’t mean to undercut your point though, they often talk about PDSs as analogous to web pages, so your “different search engines” analogy is very accurate, it’s just not quite there yet.

I’d love to take credit for this, but the ATProto docs themselves make this comparison which is where I’m getting this from.

if I recall correctly either in (((streams))) or Forte (or maybe both) MIke implemented the nomadic identity over ActivityPub as well

This sent me down a bit a of a rabbit hole. It seems (streams) used an updated version of Zot, Zot/11 but was renamed to just Nomad. I can’t find anything about this, the (streams) repo only contains the spec for Zot/6, so I’m not sure about it’s APub compatibility. Apparently, Nomad had been discontinued in Forte in favour of pure APub, anyway.

If you’re thinking about this kind of stuff for Lemmy, it’s also worth looking at https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/fep-ef61-portable-objects/3738

Oh, I know about Silverpill’s work, it’s really interesting! I even mentioned it recently. I’m glad we have someone smart like them working on this stuff.

I do think some kind of separation of user data from servers, like what AT Proto does, is actually quite desirable. I just don’t like that PDSes can have their data harvested by whoever, I think data sharing with a server should be opt-in.

Or for the new crosspost display to be collpased by default.

That’s what Photon and Thunder do and imo, it works pretty well. Especially for posts with like a 10 crossposts, example.

Oh, I thought blacksky.comnunity used Blacksky’s relay. If it uses Bluesky’s then yeah, disregard what I said.

That’s not a perfect analogy though because Blacksky makes different moderation decisions than Bluesky.

I’d hope so given how abysmal Bluesky’s moderation is. The discovery feed is filled with transphobia, but you can’t say Charlie Kirk should rest in piss.

Again though it’s not a perfect analogy because the AT Protocol architecture lets you migrate all your data between PDSs seamlessly, and so far only a few niche ActivityPub implementations support that (Hubzilla et al with nomadic identity, ActivityPods using Solid Pods).

I don’t believe Hubzilla’s nomatic identity works with APub though, irrc it uses something called Zot.

I’ve been thinking about how to add nomatic identity to Lemmy quite a bit and it’s something I’d like to work on after 1.0 is out, but it’s hard a problem for sure.

I can see that, I just hate the added friction. I’d rather the boost button stay as it is and quote be put into the meatball menu.

It’s an action that needs confirmation anyway. :)

This is a setting on your account, under ‘Appearance’. I have it off.

A better analogy would probably saying it’s like Bing/Google. They’re independent of each other but broadly what’s on one is on the other.

If an author of a post has enabled quoting, you’ll see an option to quote their post under a new menu accessed from the Boost button.

Oh no, I hate this kind of interface. If I a click a button, it should do something, not open a menu.

independent but still connected (think about Lemmy instances)

It’s not really connected in the same sense two Lemmy instances are connected. They’re able to pull in the same data as Bluesky as it’s all public and PDSs don’t really have the ability to block a relay from crawling them.

The discourse around decentralisation has elevated a form of network architecture that facilitates and contributes to a healthier social internet into a goal into itself.

Big agree with this.