Did you seriously cite a Medium article? C’mon now, it’s an open blog where anyone can write anything without any fact checking. Ir’s worse than Wikipedia.

According to a tech crunch article, “As of today, Honey’s 17 million members have saved more than $2 billion to date.”

That translates to a lot of transactions.

I don’t think YOU understood. You fabricated a scenario that doesn’t exist “AOC making a nazi salute”, and then claimed that nobody would have said anything about it, therefore it’s a double-standard.

You conjured an event out of thin air, and then claimed your imaginary event that never even happened was proof of an existing double-standard.

Now if AOC ever does an Elon and makes a constipated face while smashing her hand to her heart and grunting like a pig while thrusting it straight out in a nazi salute… twice… and nobody says anything… see, then you would have a point.

Then I guess NO movie can be called original, because at a minimum they begin with a written screenplay, so that screenplay is the ORIGINAL work in pedanticland.

And here I thought the grammar police were bad.

A glazed donut is a pastry with a shiny coating of sugar covering it. The basic idea is that if you put someone’s body-part in your mouth, for the purposes of this discussion, let’s call it a “long finger”, when it leaves your mouth, the wetness gives it a shiny look like it was glazed.

So to say you are glazing someone would mean you are such a fan of that person, you would be willing to make some parts of them really, really shiny with your mouth saliva.

Just wait until NASA issues another contract to SpaceX so they can blow up another $5 billion in taxpayer dollars

I suppose you are going to tell everyone that Dune was based on a book the next time someone compliments the pacing and direction of that movie?

The poster art for Arrival says it’s based on a story by Ted Chiang, it isn’t some secret nobody knows but you.

What does being original or not have anything to do with what the original commenter wrote? MOST movies are based on previously existing stories. They were focusing on the movie. If you read the book and want to show everyone how much more you know than they do, it would be more impressive if you had said “i read the story the movie was based on, and comparatively, <your opinion here>”. It might have even made for an interesting and productive comment.

I like that strawman you built, it’s so weak and flimsy a small breeze would knock it over.

You know it’s funny, but I’ve NEVER seen a comment or a post from you guys saying “BOTH SIDES ARE THE SAME, HERE ARE 10 EXAMPLES THAT PROVE IT”

But I have seen plenty of comments and posts listing example after example of just how different the progressive party is from the conservatives.

All I ever see from Team BSS is the same generic “both sides same lol because thats how I FEEL” type of answer. Never any receipts to backup those feels, I wonder why?

Um, PayPal paid $4,000,000,000 to buy Honey. $4 billion. Now, think about how much profit Honey would have had to been generating for PP to look at the numbers and buy it for that much. However it “started”, the functionality to steal was in there before they sold it to PayPal

The dude spent a year figuring this out, researching and getting all his ducks in a row. What did you do, whats your contribution? Oh, let’s see, you bravely complained in a comments section about the way he chose to release the info, accusing him of the crime of sensationalism for clicks.

Gee, why would he want to get paid for his work?? HOW SELFISH! It’s not like there are companies out there trying to steal content creator revenue, right??

The way you complain more about him than the company, makes me wonder, do you work for Paypal, or that new project, Pie? Just weird to see you trying to make him look bad for wanting to get paid for his work. Sounds like a Honey thing to do.