If you’re Canadian then don’t “Y’all” have elections coming up and shouldn’t you be focusing on preventing far-right extremists from taking over there instead of nitpicking in comment sections here?

This American was rooting for you, too.

Ah much small government, telling others what to do and intruding on one’s conversation with their doctor.

Such individual freedom!

Omg yes I’d drink SO much soy milk. Like, my already puny muscles would shrivel in the wake of such based alpha wolf assertion of dominance.

I have them tagged as a foreign wedge driver fwiw.

They indeed do argue in bad faith.

To be honest, we should be protesting Democrats until they cede more control to progressives in the party, mainly AOC.

Step 1 is reforming their platform to be more competitive.

Unfortunately it works. We have to remember that their methodology is the reason why they have a massive audience in the first place. So we need to distinguish the marketing from the material.

Dems could learn a thing or two from Republicans on this front.

“No one” was? News to me that I wasn’t talking about him. We weren’t talking about JFK either until I brought him up as well but I don’t hear you bitching about that, do I? lol… Do you not understand how comment threads work?

Look up the definition of ad hominem bud cause you clearly fundamentally don’t understand what you’re doing. You can’t discredit an argument by attacking the speaker no matter how hard you try, it’s a fallacy. You can absolutely argue in any state you want and if the argument has merit it has merit.

Funny enough, I have a literal poster beside me with the definition. This is not it, buddy. You can definitely recognize someone in an altered mental state not thinking straight when rational thought is not yet possible. It’s like trying to get through to someone in an insane asylum. At some point, it becomes fair to wonder if someone is in the right state of mind before proceeding. Ever try to argue with a drunkard while sober? lol!

I can discredit the argument when I won on substance and now you move to deflection and irrational thought.

Jesus Christ you are just too fucking stupid to know what’s going on. I’m having a hard time believing you’re real right now. Once again my entire point is that you brought Trump up out of nowhere. What isn’t subjective. And that being a straw man is also not subjective. The point is not subjective. You’re so fucking weird.

Now that’s an Ad Hominem! I see you practice what you preach, is that right buddy?

Once again I raised JFK out of nowhere yet I don’t see you crying, moping, seething over that — funny how that is?

I’ll raise Trump a thousand more times if it pisses you off this much with glee. Ironically, you still couldn’t get back to the point LOL.

Anyways, this has been amusing. Bystander audience sees you lost so I rest my case.

I will graciously oblige you with the final response.

You’ll need it.

Good morning, sunshine. Weed wear off yet or did you already start up again?

I have no problem with weed any more than I do some light social alcohol versus someone who makes it their live or drives under the influence. Similarly arguing under the influence is a no no. Smartest engineers I know definitely aren’t coming to work stoned or drunk, but maybe you and I have different standards?

Now I know raising Trump really triggered you for some reason — as I said, most would either just ignore that remark or go, “Yeah Trump would’ve definitely botched the crisis” — but let’s get back to the point:

Yes or No — would Trump have botched the deescalation of the CMC relative to JFK? Who would you prefer in that moment of crisis? Try not to deviate too wildly now, buddy ;)

Oh you little flippant stoner anarchist, you ;)

Still triggered about the mention of Trump, I see. Is he like He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named to you or something? Hahahah

How about you just step aside from the geopolitics for a few more years and just enjoy your bong a little bit longer, buddy?

Who said anything about contact? We’re talking contrast. Keep up, buddy! I’m so amused at how triggered you became by my raising Trump. Most people would’ve gone, “Yeah… Trump definitely would’ve disastrously handled the Cuban Missile Crisis more than JFK,” but not you good sir… You seethed so much you had to interject in a discussion between two other users, it upset you that much… Which tells me all I need to know about you. If you ask me, that’s the real cringe.

You could’ve just stopped at, “I don’t know shit” and had a much stronger, more accurate statement.

Why do I get this odd sense these two accounts are the same user circle-jerking themselves? lol. Nobody is that pathetic…

… Are they?

• Dude makes bullshit claim that Kennedy was inching us toward nuclear war.
• I raise literal historical evidence detailing that wasn’t the case.
• Other user deflects.
• To drive the point home, I raise a modern incompetent President to highlight what’s called a contrast to paint a picture as to how an incompetent president might actually inch us toward nuclear war in such a predicament (shouldn’t take much imagination).
• You then seem to get triggered — almost obsessed — with my raising of Trump that it seems to escape you that the other user entirely dodged the argument.

So if you’re not a high schooler, then are you either bullshitting me, or are you stoned out of your mind right now? Perhaps drinking?

Sorry raising Trump seems to scare you or something? Perfectly relevant to compare and contrast two presidents in their approach to resolving a crisis, but I suspect that’s a bit beyond your capacity for critical-thinking. Memes and cringe is more your speed, I take it? Are you still in high school?

These responses are so predictable I can pre-write my reply. You’ve got absolutely nothing to support your original claim, and continue to dodge all substance. This discussion is over.

Outclassed.

Are you ever going to raise how Kennedy led us to nuclear annihilation? Am I living in a fallout shelter right now? lol. Where were you ever going with raising the CMC?

You’ve dodged all substance, knowing you were outclassed.

I said like a child. Big difference, by the way.

Who’s angry? This is more akin to assertively disciplining a child who tries to lie.

You just said some bullshit, got called on it, then ran away without any substantive argument. That is all that happened here.

Have a great day as well!

Go ahead and ask me if I at any point cared whether you did or not.

But I did.

You know last I checked the Cuban Missile Crisis never led to nuclear annihilation?

You do realize the CMC deescalated in lieu of these letters, riiighhtttt…?

Sounds like he didn’t creep us toward anything but rather navigated us away.

Could a dipshit like Donnie have done the same? Big doubt.