Just came from another thread detailing them walking back the skin=class change. Glad to that’s being fixed, as that’s definitely the most egregious issue, but I’m very disappointed to hear the gunplay is less impactful. That was KF2’s biggest strength imo, esp as a Commando main when I played it frequently. Popping domes in slo Mo was art.

Agreed. Not everyone who says the sequel trilogy is bad is an angry little pissbaby, but so many are, and I can’t help but think implicit (or, depending on the take, explicit) misogyny plays a role in encouraging that style of “discourse”. Like, OPs post is a whisper away from blaming DEI for handing their beloved franchise off to a clueless woman who didn’t give the fans the fawning worship that they are owed.

Also, if it worked, her hands off approach to corporate oversight of auteur creatives would be something we’d all be singing her praises for. Of course, it didn’t, but I’m not going to sit here and say, hmm yes, I want Disney corporate offices to have MORE control over their creatives, that will fix the lukewarm slop that the franchise is delivering!

She’s 71 and has been producing films since ET. I’m pretty sure she’s not pulling a Palpatine here.

This isn’t a direct answer to your question per se, but if this a topic that interests you, I can’t recommend The Right Stuff enough. I’ve not seen the film from the 80s, though by all accounts it’s pretty good, but the book is an excellent overview of the early days of space exploration, when the exact sort of questions that you ask here were being bandied about by the fledgling, pre-Apollo program NASA.

The focus of the book is on the first wave of astronauts who, as someone else mentioned, were pulled primarily from combat aviation backgrounds. I recall several passages which detailed their reactions to the sorts of psychological testing that they were undergoing, usually complete with humorous anecdotes.