splendid9583
- 0 Posts
- 17 Comments
It seems that the people managing privacyguides.org believe that “Balancing security, privacy, and usability is one of the first and most difficult tasks you’ll face on your privacy journey.” https://www.privacyguides.org/en/basics/threat-modeling/
That does raise the question about whether we want to make information available for someone on a “privacy journey” or “security journey” or some other type of journey. https://blog.hubspot.com/marketing/target-audience I suspect that
securityguides.orgisn’t being used like how privacyguides.org is right now.
This is very interesting information!
I’d like to note that it’s likely that several recommendations used as examples have been superseded with information around https://www.privacyguides.org/en/real-time-communication/ and similar locations, since expressing “use WhatsApp” makes me suspicious (and “use Wire” does not make me more confident): https://www.makeuseof.com/why-i-dont-trust-whatsapp/ https://proton.me/blog/is-whatsapp-safe
I recall seeing something like https://jamstack.org/generators/ and maybe https://github.com/myles/awesome-static-generators in the past, but I prefer to use https://orgmode.org/manual/HTML-export-commands.html and something similar to https://about.gitlab.com/blog/gitlab-pages-setup/#option-a-gitlab-ci-for-plain-html-websites
https://docs.gitlab.com/user/project/pages/getting_started/pages_new_project_template/#project-templates might be interesting to you
We only recommend F-Droid as a way to obtain apps which cannot be obtained via the means above.
The “means above” that I see are:
- Obtainium
- GrapheneOS App Store
- Aurora Store
- Manually with RSS Notifications
I don’t see any mean “below” F-Droid.
I don’t think that privacyguides.org will have to be updated significantly if something related to F-Droid happens since it already documents that “there are some security-related downsides to how F-Droid builds, signs, and delivers packages”. It’s clear to me that using F-Droid should only be used when it’s clear that all other means will fail to produce suitable results.
splendid9583@kbin.earthto
News@lemmy.world•Clarence Thomas says precedent might not determine cases on upcoming supreme court docket
21·2 months agoThere is an extremely long history of discussion about Clarence Thomas and stare decisis / precedent.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/04/us/politics/clarence-thomas-supreme-court-precedent.html






https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-blowing-bubba-message-epstein-emails-under-scrutiny-11046836