John Richard

Duh! I’ve been saying this on here and getting called a Nazi as a result. First, censorsing & criminalizing free speech is fasscist behavior. But it is also causes those groups to grow.

Well good news if they are successful in their arguments it can set precedent to make piracy legal.

I think the closest you can come is open source an entire business, from business plans, architecture, systems, payment processing, etc.

Have you experienced this yourself?

Maybe you should stop being one then

Buttholes can suck?

Of course, most people would recognize that the laws concerning the transportation of people without seats or seatbelts applies to ALL vehicles and only a completely disingenuous fuckwit would focus on the U-Haul part.

Not wearing a seatbelt in the back of a truck isn’t an arrestable offense, nor against the law in almost half the states. What if they were seated & wearing safety harnesses? You can always call the Lincoln Heights police & ask for clarification or to lodge a complaint if their safety is a big priority to you.

Another thing that only a disingenuous fuckwit would do is try to equate literal, flag-waving Nazis specifically trying to incite hatred and fear towards minorities with all other public gatherings.

I didn’t, but what I said were things that upsets people. Abortion upsets people where pro-lifers believe it is murder. Supporting Palestine upsets people where pro-Israelis believe it is supporting terrorists. Just because something doesn’t upset you, doesn’t mean it doesn’t upset other people. Clearly you get upset very easily. Are you not able to regulate your emotions or did you forget to take your meds?

And pretty much all the examples you gave have a history of police breaking them up for precisely the reasons I listed, but the cops didn’t lift a finger here

You didn’t cite any cases, so if you want to make a point then link to some legal cases and I’ll cross-check them with similar cases.

I don’t type this for you, because you already know you’re full of shit.

You failed to provide any evidence or cite a single case. All you do is scream like your parents took away your Xbox. You typed this to try to prove to yourself that you’re way more intelligent than all the attorneys, legal scholars, amicus curiae’s, judges, etc. that have already litigated matters like this, which I argue are way more beneficial to causes you might actually care about if you’d listen & stop screeching. Were you never taught any coping mechanisms or do you not know how to do legal research? Nothing gets done by screaming.

Almost everything you’ve said indicates to me you’re a fascist. You want to censor people that non-violently expresses opinions you don’t like, you don’t care about the rule of law and you don’t see other humans that offend you as being anything more than “a worthless waste of oxygen.”

So what are you arguing for exactly then. That since the cops have committed injustices, that they should commit more? When someone gets arrested & charges get dropped due to insufficient evidence, then that is the perfect opportunity for someone to file a lawsuit for violating their civil rights. I’m not pretending that injustices don’t happen, but the solution in my eyes isn’t for more injustice.

Black people & students can organize & exercise their rights to free speech. Do you think it is forbidden? The issue with most university protest is that campuses are private property and so if the school says they can’t protest on their property, then they can be trespassed. That is very different. I’m not pretending that there aren’t injustices. In fact, there have been plenty of lawsuits where someone has sued for having their civil rights violated and won. Multiple times a year you hear about how cities have had to pay out hundreds of thousands, sometimes several million, because of it.

The solution to injustices though isn’t more injustice. You think the solution to cops shooting someone who hasn’t committed a crime, is to shoot more people that haven’t committed a crime?

Transporting 30+ people in the back of an unsecured U-Haul

LOL… what statute is this, never heard of U-Haul crime before.

Causing a disturbance? Public Nuisance? Disorderly Conduct?

I don’t think you even know what some of these are cause if you did then you wouldn’t suggest them, but you’re suggesting anytime people organize together to exercise their free speech that they should be arrested because people get upset that they have gathered. So I guess no more pride festivals cause they’d all get locked up. No more pro-choice marches cause they’d get locked up. The list goes on and on. Is that really what you want?

Do you not think that has been tried before and that courts have ruled on it? Maybe go read some case law & try to make an intelligent argument.

So they are upset that the cops arrested people in this instance for breaking the law? If people were attacking them & damaging their property because they didn’t like their free speech, then that is a crime.

So you’re unwilling to do any actual work or put any effort into understanding the current law and how you’d go about changing it if that is what you think should happen? How does complaining about cops acting within the law help you in this case?

Again, what crime has been committed? Did you know that prominent Jewish attorneys have also defended Nazis’ rights to free speech? Can you guess why that might be?

Isn’t that how Netanyahu asserts his dominance?

Free speech has been litigated many times in the US. What is the most recent prominent court decision you’d like to discuss on the subject? Also, I didn’t hear any of them calling for torturing & killing people in the video. Did you?

What crime did they commit? You are way outside your element here, but try your best to come up with something citing some prominent case law in the US to support your claims.

So the cops didn’t arrest people for their free speech & people are upset?

Many Lemmy users are quick to judge users based on instances. Heck some of them are defederated.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod