data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7d6f/f7d6ff5af5df5248aec45490f3bde1ed8def9fbe" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f2f93/f2f939022ffae29e4decb326a98f4493d0a2e13e" alt=""
Do you think enough people will learn of this in time for the jury selection, in theory?
Historically, how often has this happened?
Can nods or other physical gestures count as an intent to nullify the process? Like a fresh tattoo of the green super mario bro. There’s plausible deniability there, right?
Sorry for all the questions, I’m just sick of talking to chatbots. I crave answers from human beings. I don’t want a chatbot’s heartless, supposedly unbiased answer. Throw in as much bias as you’d like.
People are going to die. That Tesla cybertruck came with safety flaws, from breaking bones and risk of death. And that was WITH safety oversight.
Imagine all the other flaws that were found and they had to be fixed which slowed down development, upsetting the efficiency deity or shareholders or whoever the fuck
The next Tesla model released is going to cause deaths on release day, if that project has no safety oversight.
I’m kind of high, so I can’t tell if my opinion is obvious or unfounded or made any sense at all.
isnt this how cyberpunk happens big corporations seize democracy and eventually you have a terrorism charge for saying xzy Corp is shit, while everyone else is now much poorer.