I would try, but it wouldn’t be as smug as this meme.

And they will guard the reflection pool from Aunt Tifa

Wanted to expand on what others have said about the randomness of LLMs being unsafe, because that response angers those who think “alignment” is the solution. Alignment is additional training to constrain the randomness to not do bad things like crime. But even the staff that works on aligning this software have their doubts about whether this process will make the software safe (this article), and even their own researchers are coming out and saying “oops, it did a crime” but in a way where it hypes the ability of the software (see other articles about it hacking). Then there is the recent news of OpenAi’s recent model that drops chain of thought observability (a feature the let’s you read what the model is “thinking”) - a very useful tool in reviewing whether the model is engaging in unsafe activities. They sacrificed observability for benchmark performance. This tells us the people developing this software don’t think it will ever be safe, but they are trying to spin it as “because it can out smart us” when in reality it is simply unpredictable and they are making it less predictable to make it more “capable”. If we started holding these companies accountable for these rogue hacks and psychotic episodes then we would start to see serious thought put towards these models being safe or at the very least guidelines around when not to use the models.

Here’s an idea: don’t use unsafe software where safety is needed.

If the orange turd wants it then it probably isn’t good for us

I can think of 3 million reasons why Macklemore making a statement would save lives (1 reason for every $1 raised so far)

Hey OP, why do billionaires flex their power to protect a genocide and are surprised when it comes with consequences?

Holding a president accountable for attempting a coupe is fascist how?

deleted by creator

United Kansas because ArKansas is in denial.

I think it’s the other way around. They said we need to slow down AI so this story is now being told

Because saying it is bad to bomb children should not be controversial and we need to set that expectation.

I mean of all the things to criticize China about, a planned economy should be one to avoid.

I find this kind of response insufferable. It shifts the conversation from a systems critique to personal responsibility. You could have posted this in response the OP, and it would be equally on point and useless.

I have personalized ads turned of in YouTube and it seems half the ads are for gambling as of late.

Reminds me of something Alok said about playbooks: we focus on the books but forget to play.

the actions of this system cannot be predicted by anyone.

Reminds me of TempleOS where the author thought a random number generator sends messages from god. It was fun when it’s just one person experiencing psychosis in a non-violent way. But the mass AI psychosis is the opposite of fun.

And anyone who has a retirement holding index funds is also complicit?

I don’t think they want that smoke, better to let your competitor hurt themselves

I remember how the current congress led us to a government shutdown only to fold like lawn chairs in return for a pinky promise that was later broken. There are options that don’t require overriding the president because congress has the power of the purse and the power to investigate.