I think you need to read a history book. You’re all pissed off but I’m not even wrong. The carnist diet and ‘you need meat’ ideology is all rooted in racism. You can’t even point out my alleged ‘problems’. You just state that there is some and leave it at that to feel superior. Do you need reading material suggestions to learn about American culinary and agricultural racism?
It’s a question. Not even a statement, let alone a lie.
It’s a question designed to look for assumed bias, by flipping the roles of the example to see if the judgement of the situation still holds.
If the judgement fails to hold, it’s likely a biased judgement.
Your unwillingness to engage in the question is a tassit admission of your bias, and your awareness of it. Your disregard for the importance of that bias suggests a sense of superiority. That your opinion supercedes any rules. Can you think of anyone else who shares that kind of confidence?
I assure I wasn’t.
I did in my previous comment. That was intentional, as you kept bringing it up.
But prior to that was a genuine question. An opportunity for you to actually justify and support your view. You could have said “Yes it’s still propaganda.” But instead you seem resigned in your refusal to engage with the idea. So, yah I made some fun and pushed your favorite button.
Should you wish to engage in a constructive discussion. Let me know. I’ll be here.
You’re trying to avoid obvious simple problems in your discourse here.
I think you need to read a history book. You’re all pissed off but I’m not even wrong. The carnist diet and ‘you need meat’ ideology is all rooted in racism. You can’t even point out my alleged ‘problems’. You just state that there is some and leave it at that to feel superior. Do you need reading material suggestions to learn about American culinary and agricultural racism?
You’re bad at mind reading. I’m entertained, amused. Quite happy realy. You saved me from boredom.
I’m not sure that your problems are yet. You aren’t engaging with my pertaining questions or points, so I can’t really evaluate what they may be.
Thats because you are sea lioning and nor really engaging 👍
I tried to engage. You refused to reciprocate.
Lies. Deception. You opened with sea lioning.
It’s a question. Not even a statement, let alone a lie.
It’s a question designed to look for assumed bias, by flipping the roles of the example to see if the judgement of the situation still holds.
If the judgement fails to hold, it’s likely a biased judgement.
Your unwillingness to engage in the question is a tassit admission of your bias, and your awareness of it. Your disregard for the importance of that bias suggests a sense of superiority. That your opinion supercedes any rules. Can you think of anyone else who shares that kind of confidence?
That is a question, and look you asked even more. Heres the definition of sealoining cause you apparently need it https://www.dictionary.com/culture/slang/sealioning
I assure I wasn’t.
I did in my previous comment. That was intentional, as you kept bringing it up.
But prior to that was a genuine question. An opportunity for you to actually justify and support your view. You could have said “Yes it’s still propaganda.” But instead you seem resigned in your refusal to engage with the idea. So, yah I made some fun and pushed your favorite button.
Should you wish to engage in a constructive discussion. Let me know. I’ll be here.
why are you using some obscure slur?
Its not a slur lmao it would be a slang verb of some sort since its an action you do.
make any excuse you want, I guess