• Novocirab@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    This is a huge opportunity. All of us Linux geeks now need to be on mainstream social media platforms and actively seek out and help everyone who expresses an interest in switching from Windows to Linux.

    • innermachine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 days ago

      Let me save you the trip. I have an old trash spec hp all in one that’s had the bag beat out of it, what is the best lightweight Linux distro to make this a usable web browsing and PDF file viewer? (To be used in my garage to look at FSM, wiring diagrams, play music, Google crap etc nothing demanding). I’ve tried mint and it works ok but thinking lighter weight ?

      • kwedd@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 hours ago

        You could try Linux Mint XFCE edition. Comes with a more lightweight desktop environment.

        • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          At that point you might as well just run Debian Testing with XFCE. Or Xubuntu. Basically the same thing.

          • kwedd@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Other Debian-based distros with XFCE are going to be very similar, yes.

            Xubuntu is going to install Snaps if you install some software through apt, though, which imo is kind of gross. That’s the reason I switched to Mint. But if you like Snaps, it’s arguably a better choice.

            Debian might be slightly harder to set up. However, from what I hear, it’s easy enough for most people now.

            If you’re already familiar with regular Mint, XFCE Edition is going to have the same key bindings, update manager and driver manager, so it should be slightly easier to use.

      • oo1@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        I see you have only two different answers so far. which is just not playing the game. i’ll give you another two; there are at least 15 “best lightweight linux distro”. For your use, I’d pick any one at random, try it out on a bootable usb.

        Personslly, I’d try stock debian and choose LXQT for a lightweight desktop.

        puppylinux also deserves a mention, I always have a bootble PL usb lying around somewhere. Its reliable , fast for a usb, very good potato-compatibility, has loads of useful programmes and utilitiea already in there. I’ve never actually installed it permanently though. Scared of making a commitment to slackware that I don’t understand.

        I’d avoid Damn Small and Tiny Core though - unless you really need them. Cool as they are they are well out of mainstream.

        • innermachine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Hmmm I have yet to try puppy Linux, potatoe compatible is exactly what I am in the market for. Think I’ll give it a try ty!

      • Swakkel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Damn Small Linux is very lightweight and comes with browser and PDF viewer preloaded. It doesn’t have a GUI software installer though, so you will have to use the terminal if you need to install stuff.

      • sykaster@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I installed MX Linux on an old tablet/ laptop with 2GB RAM AND 30GB storage. Works very well except for the webcam, but that’s because the hardware is made so that only windows can use it correctly.