China’s firewall plays a crucial role in shaping the country’s digital landscape, preventing foreign intervention, and maintaining national security. While often criticized in the West, the firewall provides China with the ability to control information flow, shield its population from foreign influence, and protect domestic media.

  • bdonvr@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    1 year ago

    People when talking about EU banning US social media and fostering domestically-based networks: hell yeah 😎😎😎

    When China does it: evil commies! Brainwashed! Chinese people are too stupid to see they’re being manipulated!

  • shath [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    ·
    1 year ago

    correct - if they didn’t do this they would’ve left themselves open to western tech companies basically monopolizing digital infrastructure with little recourse for chinese tech firms to stand on their own feet.

    much less the fact that the western tech firms are 24 government agencies wearing a layer of VC money

  • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    Damm you russian spies controlling social media and influencing the result of our election.

    So let’s regulate this shitty space controlled by big corporations? … MY FREEZE PEACH!!!

  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Oh shit this blew up, lol. Haven’t seen the video, but protectionism is necessary if you want to develop your own industry and not have it undermined by a country that has hegemonic control over said industry, so control on the internet is a good thing. Same with not allowing said hostile foreign actors to sow dissent unrestricted.

  • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    If it’s cool with everyone here, I’m just going to spend the next eight hours getting extremely mad with people on the Internet over my refusal to watch a 40 minute video essay on YouTube, or read literally anything.

  • CapriciousDay@lemmy.mldeleted by creator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    The firewall seemed like a much more egregious affront to information freedom over a decade ago. Since 2016 or so things have changed. Now with ubiquitous online western astroturfing disinformation campaigns, increasingly shit, biased media and in combination with increasingly divergent regulatory regime’s between the EU and the US leading to less than universal access even between those regions - in 2025 the firewall seems a lot more reasonable.

    • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      It only seemed that way because we were not as aware of the extent of western information warfare operations. In reality the firewall has always been justified.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    No thanks I dont need the government controlling the information i consume.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US corporate-survellance state already does. If you’re living in New Zealand, according to here, your country’s entire social media infrastructure is US owned and controlled.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is completely different. Even though there are big US websites we’re still free to travel to any site on the web. Thats not the case in China.

    • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      You might not need that but the US has spent the last several years proving conclusively that some people absolutely fucking do need someone controlling the information they consume

    • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The US government already does that. It controls US based social media. If you don’t live in the US you should want your government to control the social media you use because at least that way you can have a say in that control via the (nominally) democratic control you exert over your own government. Either way someone controls it. By not having digital sovereignty your country is just handing the control over your information space to a foreign government which can then use it to shape your opinions and views to their advantage instead of yours.

      • Psythik@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Okay? So? Still doesn’t justify censorship, no matter what country is doing it. A free and neutral net is crucial, no matter where you’re from.

        • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is no such thing as a “free and neutral net”. It would be nice if there were but sadly that’s just a fairly tale for children. Someone is always in control.

          • Psythik@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes obviously. If not governments, then Google, Meta, etc. are controlling the narrative. Doesn’t mean we should give up and just let them. China is no less evil than the US, or the big corporations that control us all. Don’t give up and give in to any of them. Resist until the day you die.

        • Kras Mazov@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          A free and neutral net is crucial

          If you allow nazis, zionists and other reactionary ideals to roam free, that’s not neutrality, that’s being complicit. It’s siding with the oppressors. The very idea of neutrality is just centrist thinking, that is, a fantasy.

          Because of this supposed “neutrality” that you have places like 4chan that are infested with nazi/fascists.

    • 小莱卡@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      if you’re from new zealand you should beg for a policy like this so new zealand could develop its own privately owned social media, instead of relying on American tech oligarchs. it makes absolutely no sense for someone outside of the US, which has its social media market completely dominated by US tech companies, to complain about this.

    • Psythik@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. What the fuck is wrong with everyone in this thread?

      Doesn’t matter if China is doing it, doesn’t matter if the US is doing it. Censorship is evil. Full stop.

  • zagaberoo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    “the ability to control information flow”

    Yay! What a feature! Tell me what I’m allowed to know, O lord.