• iii@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    That was simply the euphemism du jour, on the eternal euphemism treadmill.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here’s my random two cents about disability euphemisms.

      I personally think “special”, which was pretty popular like 10 years ago, was/is pretty demeaning. Even the more recent “differently-abled” feels weird.

      I think the plain language of “disability”, which seems to have been around quite a while now, is fine. It’s what is says on the tin, without judgement.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      can you really call it a euphemism when it just used to be a medical term back then?

        • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s not only the ‘SJW’ crowd who are asking people to stop using it, but also the medical field, patients, and their caregivers directly asking everyone to stop.

          The results of both the parent and professional surveys support a move away from the use of the term mental retardation. The majority of parents indicated that they would be upset if a physician used the term mental retardation.

          • infinite_ass@leminal.space
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Probably under pressure from the SJWs. Medical people are practically minded, not given to rewriting the nomenclature to suit the fashion of the hour (they still use Latin for God’s sake). Unless the money is threatened of course.