Given the current political climate isn’t it kinda terrifying to have the CTOs of four tech giants with unlimited access to user personal data in the military chain of command?

  • Voytrekk@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This is odd. Of they need tech know-how, then they could have written up a contract for them to fill. Adding officers like this, especially out of wartime feels like an overreach. Maybe Trump needs some more loyal officers.

    • Mirshe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      14 hours ago

      This is how Russia works too, and a lot of other dictatorships. If you buy your way in, you too can have a commissioned rank, and the respect, security, and stipend it comes with.

      I’m getting the vibe that this is going to be a prelude to privatization.

    • argh_another_username@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Politics aside, I imagine hiring a fat gamer or a wheel chair bound person to pilot drones is an interesting idea. War is becoming more mind than body.

      • Riskable@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It’s super interesting, right? Are there any other armies around the world that have lowered their minimum health/boot camp requirements in order to recruit more people like drone pilots, software developers, and various other engineers?

        Seems like a good idea to me. Ever since WW2 technology has been the most important factor in warfare. So much so that it now doesn’t matter if you have a single soldier ready to deploy if you have nuclear ICBMs (not that it’s a good thing we have those).

        The difference today is that what you need are lots of people to “man” data/operations centers and just a few ready to deploy for actual combat. Also, a lot of people involved in manufacturing and with skills like CNC machining and 3D printing.

        None of those skill sets are conducive to “being in shape”. Rather than focus on troops being “ready for anything” it makes more sense to have them housed right next to the systems they work with so they can roll out of the bunk and into the operations center like a fireman rather than out of a barracks and on to a troop transport.

        • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          A good way to lower entry requirements is to be at war. There’s no need to do that if you’re at peace and (mostly) hit your recruitment targets. Keep in mind that people can get transferred from unit to unit depending on armed forces’ needs, not necessarily your needs.

          what you need are lots of people to “man” data/operations centers and just a few ready to deploy for actual combat.

          Maybe in smaller countries and smaller wars. You still need a shitload of people to hold defensive positions for your pilots and other “remote” staff to have any effect. Would be true for insurgencies probably.

          nuclear ICBMs (not that it’s a good thing we have those)

          Debatable. I’d rather have some rn, it’s a good deterrent.

  • tomatolung@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    For those who have read the Galaxy’s Edge series, I can only think of the appointees (aka 'Points). Political appointed officer who often end up getting the legionaries killed and lack the combat prowess/skill to be in the officer position they exercise.

    Realistically we have many other direct commission officers such as the medical, engineers, legal, etc. What’s really different here is they are not requiring the full 5 week Direct commission officer basic course .

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If they’re bringing on “IT leadership” people then the only place where they’re going to be bossing people around is cubicles, conference rooms, and operations centers.

      They may get people killed but it will be because they underestimated the damages caused by their hackers. In fact, I highly suspect that there will be a huge “collateral damage” incident from US/Israel hackers using an undisclosed vulnerability to break into something that “the bad guys” then use to break into some important systems all over the world.

      Imagine a major industrial control vulnerability that gets turned into a worm by Iran that then causes massive explosions and chemical fires all over the world. Even in countries that have nothing to do with their current conflict.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      You don’t have a front line there. Closest I can think of is a ship, or one of the random bases but considering they’re in the army reserve they’ll most likely never see those.

    • Riskable@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      The “front line” in that war is an operations center somewhere in the US where they control spy satellites and tell our allies, submarines, & other remote equipment what to do.

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I can’t say I take issue with the idea of bringing technology innovators into the military in order to do technology innovation. These are not the assholes I would’ve chosen.