• grue@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I don’t align with the fuckcars movement.

    Why is that, and what would you suggest we do to improve its appeal? I recognize that we’re sort of the radical fringe of urbanism and that’s on purpose (a radical fringe is necessary for any movement, in order to make the moderates look moderate), but within that bound I am interested in trying to develop as much credibility as possible.

    (Feel free to PM me if you’d prefer to answer without inviting a public debate, and thanks in advance for any feedback you’re willing to give!)

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’m in the same boat. I’m here because I want to discuss things related to transit, walkability, better quality of life, renewable energy and new technology: there’s so much we can do to improve people’s lives while also being easier on the planet and cost less.

      I’m not frustrated by cars, but more that cars are the only goal. From my experiences the best we can hope for in most places is less need of personal cars. It even gives us a continuing goal: however car dependent we are now, how can we be less so?

      This tends to come out in discussions, for example, on parking minimums. While I agree we need to waste less real estate on parking, home and park-n-rides are different. The reality is people in the US are not giving up their cars any time soon. Let them keep them at home while giving them better options. Let them drive to transit while we improve the transit network.