You’re insulting the DNC. You haven’t cited a single policy or vote or even quoted any statements out of context, you’re basically just trolling instead of any good faith attempt to turn anyone over to your side.
Yeah, they couldn’t say why, provide any evidence of their claim and neither could their articles, but I’m supposed to accept the claim as fact? I’m just supposed to sit down and read 6 articles which would print to like 80 pages and then accept their unsubstantial claims as fact for no reason but the sheer number of words placed in front of me? That’s really dumb, anon.
Where did i insult you?
lmao
You’re insulting the DNC. You haven’t cited a single policy or vote or even quoted any statements out of context, you’re basically just trolling instead of any good faith attempt to turn anyone over to your side.
Meanwhile, someone provides sources and you refused to read them. It looks like you just refuse to listen to anyone that doesn’t agree with you.
Yeah, that’s what sources are for, vetting information. If your source is unreliable then you get called out for it.
That’s not “calling out unreliable sources”, that’s saying “any source you provide I’m not going to read”.
Whats the matter, you hit your word limit and couldn’t finish quoting?
I’ll remind you we are currently in the thread where someone was “saying in their own words” and that wasn’t good enough for you either.
Yeah, they couldn’t say why, provide any evidence of their claim and neither could their articles, but I’m supposed to accept the claim as fact? I’m just supposed to sit down and read 6 articles which would print to like 80 pages and then accept their unsubstantial claims as fact for no reason but the sheer number of words placed in front of me? That’s really dumb, anon.
Can you direct me to any of your posts here that provide evidence for your claims?
Calling a spade a spade is not an insult to the spade.