• Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 days ago

    Someone was asking me what my dream car would be. I don’t want a car. No no but if you had unlimited money what car would you buy? I wouldn’t. No it doesn’t cost you anything, you can have it for free! Yeah, I just don’t want one.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      The irony being that you need unlimited money to be able to afford to live somewhere with proper public transportation, currently.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        Fortunately I don’t need that either. I live in a town in the UK and work remotely. I can buy everything I need by cycling to the shop and on the rare occasion I do need to go into the office (few times a year) I can cycle to the train station in a nearby town and then take the train to the city our office is in. A 2 hour commute isn’t really an issue when its only a few times a year.

    • UristMcHolland@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      If I HAD to choose a car and it could be anything… I would want an electric RV that’s covered in solar panels. I don’t care if I could only move it 10 miles a day, I would nomad my ass around just living the dream.

  • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    Reading through these comments I’m realizing a lot of the people who are advocating for cars, because they offer greater flexibility and autonomy, aren’t taking one critical thing into consideration: cars are useless without roads, and other necessary car infrastructure. You can’t use a car to get from your home to your work without someone first paving a road between them. So, if we’re going to have to build and maintain transportation infrastructure regardless, why not build infrastructure that will facilitate moving as many people from one place to another as efficiently as possible?

      • TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Yes, but bikes don’t need as much infrastructure, because bikes are typically used for shorter trips, and they are much smaller and lighter. Buses transport many more people than passenger cars, so they can transport more people using the same, or less, infrastructure.

        I don’t expect every house to have its own train stop, I expect people to live much more closely together. Cars really are a necessity when everyone is very spread out, but, again, the more spread out everyone is, the more infrastructure must be built and maintained. You think it would be ridiculous for every house to have its own train stop, but you don’t think it’s ridiculous for every house to have a road built to connect it to everything else, regardless of where that house is. The truth is, neither is cost effective or efficient.

  • eatthecake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    I don’t own or want a car. My housemate drives me to work. It’s a 7 minute drive, 50 minutes by public transport. You need to put on 10 minute buses on multiple routes through every suburb 24hrs to make public transport a viable option for most people.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      The problem with transit is more about how cities are designed, zoned, and built. If we built cities for people instead of cars the vast majority of people in a city would likely have faster commutes on transit than driving a private vehicle.

      Other things can help with this as well such as transit signal priority.

      • eatthecake@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 days ago

        It’s a 7 minute drive, i practically live in the same suburb. I also work evening shift. Are you going to put on a bus to everywhere for those 250 people who finish work at 230am? Must all of us work and live next door? I try to live as close as possible but you cant ask everyone to do that. A job change shouldnt mean you are required to move house. Its just not feasible for a city of millions to move every time they change jobs. And its not feasible to put on a bus service so me and a couple of others can get home at 230am.

        • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          16 days ago

          You’re right, it isn’t feasible to always use a bus, thats why walking, cycling, trams, and light rail should also be used. The biggest problem is density. Low density makes it very difficult to effeciently service, yet many north american zoning and building codes make it very difficult to build any housing that isn’t detached single family homes with minimum parking standards and set backs.

          • Cypher@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            16 days ago

            walking, cycling, trams, and light rail

            Ableism much? These options don’t suit a bunch of people.

            • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 days ago

              Many trams and light rail are accessible for various disabilities.

              Cars are also restrictive to people with certain disabilities. The fairest way is having a wide variety of options available, including specialized cars for those who need them. Currently, the car is pretty much the only option in many north american cities, which certainly isn’t the fairest.