• s23b@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Because there are some drugs that make people aggressive, and I personally think these ought to be curtailed where possible. (Again, not a “war on drugs” style curtailment. But distribution, still illegal and criminal)

    The first such drug that comes to my mind is alcohol. Its distribution was also criminalized in the past, eventually leading to an increase in organized crime.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is of course nuance to this, and I don’t claim to be an expert on classifying drugs. Though, I don’t reckon I need to try to hard to argue that there are drugs far worse than alcohol out there. I’m simply stating a blanket “all drugs should be legal” is overkill.

      Alcohol certainly is ripe for abuse, also.

      • Bobbinapples@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Drug criminalization pushes use into the shadows so that the most visible use is from those who are very loud and disruptive with it. I know you think you’re righteous with your “i don’t reckon i need to try to(sic) hard to argue” but you are operating on assumptions about substances borne of ignorance.

        • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not arguing for criminalisation of use and posession.

          Just making distribution of all drugs legal is overkill, in my opinion

    • HalfSalesman@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t really fully agree with the person you are responding too, but the level of aggression brought about from Meth use is significantly more potent and consistent compared to Alcohol, which is a little more variable depending on the person using it.