• Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Well, if we have boots on the moon, at that point we don’t need probes like these. At that point you just drop a sensor, or whatever experiment you want directly on the surface.

    • veee@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I was looking at it from the perspective of all the failed probes we’ve sent and whether or not the lost costs/missions could be recouped or completed somehow.

      • snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Depends on how long it sits there, the lunar surface has a pretty wide range of temperatures that cause wear, lots of radiation and the regolith is quite abrasive. But realistically by the time something gets there that could put it back it’ll probably not be worth it from anything but a historical standpoint.

        • veee@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I hadn’t considered the damage from radiation. Thanks for the perspective.