- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
You must log in or # to comment.
Duke Nukem would 100% murder the shit out of Trump.
The Duke is a successful businessman for one, women actually want to be with him and, most important, he is not a fucking pedo.
He does not have time to play with himself.
Don’t slander the good Duke!
IDK man… I think Nukem might have voted for Trump if he was real. He hates aliens that much.
But he loves babes even more. And the Cheeto isn’t good to the babes.
Human “aliens” or ETs?
ETs (and the cops turned into pigs)
The post and your comment. +1
this is heartbreaking.
i may have to go save some babes (n64 was my first experience with mr nukem)
Duke Nukem 64 was great! Especially local multiplayer!
Aaaeh….
Old Duke was fun back then. DNF, bit of a train wreck isn’t it? After that whole debacle and it being ran into ground by Pitchford. No thx.
I refuse to accept that the trainwreck called “Duke Nukem Forever” is real. Fuck Randy though.
I’m not very familiar with this character, but I’m guessing that Duke Nukem would only go to Epstein Island once.
And the only ones coming back would be him and the victims he rescued.
And after that… “Call me Santa, because I have a list and I’m checking it twice… except no one on here is any bit nice.”
Don’t fucking insult the king Duke nukem
Shart Of The Deal
If only he was half as cool as the duke.
Dook*
Declarations. Executive orders. Not bills.
Bills create law. He ain’t doing that. Most of what he does is not legal.
executive orders are still law, they just carry less weight than legislative writ. it’s complicated.
I hate to be the Akshually guy but they’re truly not laws. They’re directives for the federal agencies under the control of the executive branch. They have the " force of law " (assuming they’re aligned with the constitutional authority of the president) but they’re not laws.
They don’t create crimes, do budgets, or override congress.
if something has the force of law, it’s a law analogue and you’re arguing sophistry.
law is the profession of specifics… it’s not sophistry; it’s technicality
just like trump is not a convicted rapist: he was convicted of sexual assault
excuse me the entire practice of law is sophistry i almost married a lawyer i should know.
the law is not intended to deceive. the words are complex by necessity, but complexity is not sophistry
i think i see the problem. i think you’re an Aussie. in your legal system that might actually be true. i’m in statesia. in a past life i wrote a few entries in the Code of Federal Regulations, if that gives you some guess to the quality of the thinking in there. looking for sense in the government is the quickest path to insanity
I’m not though. They’re truly different things and I promise I’m not arguing in bad faith.
The differences I mentioned are material, especially that an executive order cannot arbitrarily criminalize something.
i think it’s that we’re arguing from different perspectives. for most people, a law is a regulation is a procedure is an executive order. they all carry about the same weight. when you actually deal with legal specifics the differences matter but to most folk they’re cinnamon rolls.
We gonna find out but they’ve also just straight up stolen cash from the government so its gonna be fun*, fam.
*fun as in lets cut the wire on a bomb and hope we successfully defused it.
From the classic internet - Ventrilo Harassment:
That whole series haha.
Awww dude 4 str 4 stam leather belt? AAHH huh huh.
Duke Poop’em is heinous lol
Duke Deuce’Em
Sign Bill’s what?
What’s this about Trump shitting his pants, by the way? It’s not the first time I’ve heard about it, but when I looked it up I found nothing.
In that press conference you can see woman in green’s face. This screenshot is from right when he shit his pants and the smell reached her nose at the speed of stench. Immediately afterward they kick all the press out.
LOL
Is that real? And why are we living in an age where this would be quite mundane?
It looks real to me. The reactions aren’t large, and maybe the shart noise at 0:34 could have been edited in, but… it all fit together with the way Trump and staff suddenly rushed the press out of the room.
AI told me it was actually a chair sliding off screen and said it was visible in other videos but it couldn’t link me to the exact point.
As much as I don’t like Trump either, I continue to doubt this claim without further evidence
0:35 is the alleged shart. Within seconds he’s trying to wrap it up. At 0:39 he’s suddenly trying to immediately wrap it up. At 0:42 the woman in green arguably reacts. More reactions from the woman in green again at 0:47 and 0:53. At 0:51 he literally gestures the press out of the room without actually moving from his chair.
If this was a grand jury, you’d get an indictment for sure. It could not be a shart, but it looks like a shart, sounds like a shart, and the woman in green smells it like a shart.
Yeah to me this fits under “a good chance but we’ll probably never know for sure.”
Of note is that the video came from right aligned news, so the odds of a malicious edit are very low.
You can also hear it rip too. The hot mic caught it.
Are you searching on Fox News or something?
? I searched on YT. It was a few days ago, when I first saw a post mentioning it.
Nuke Dukem
Someone needs to make a cut off the video where he gets asleep,cuts to the clip where he is crowned, cut to the clip where he get in the plane and launches shit on Americans, and cut back to reality where he shat himself and the journalists are asked to leave the office in a rush.
I think this is the entire purpose of AI and why it was made, but someone smarter than me needs to write the prompt.
