• bluegreenwookie@bookwormstory.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    6 days ago

    Oh the thing professionals all said would happen? That’s what they are stunned about? The very thing they were warned would happen if trump did the thing he said he would do.

          • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            6 days ago

            Governments are comprised of people. Like any other people they should be judged on their actions. Blanket statements about distrusting governments and politicians no matter what they actually do is no different than distrusting science and experts. It’s all part of how we got here.

            • orcrist@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              6 days ago

              Well no. Actually we aren’t supposed to trust the government. That’s why we have (in theory) a system of checks and balances. The whole point is that we rely on them and hope they’ll do the right thing, but we need to be paying some attention some of the time, because they will occasionally get things wrong.

              • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Well no. Actually we aren’t supposed to trust the government. That’s why we have (in theory) a system of checks and balances.

                That’s a conflation of two separate things. The checks and balances are for the different branches of government against each other and not we the people against the government.

                This idea that the population should have a general and perpetual distrust of their government no matter what is conspiracy theory logic.

                We should base trust and distrust on evidence.

            • JChildermass@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              Not only that, governments are comprised of people who are paid a fixed salary with no bonuses or incentives and strict conflict of interest rules whose literal only job is to work to make people’s lives collectively better.

              • ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                That’s how it should be. In the US, we need to outlaw insider trading for elected officials. This is a known issue, based on the evidence we have. There’s no reason to engage in any conspiracism at all.

      • BlackSheep@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Please stop the generation blaming/shaming. It’s a “divide and conquer tactic”. Also, please notice a LOT of the people at the protests are “old people”. We don’t sit behind keyboards blaming, we actually get out and DO something. And, finally, do some research and look up who voted for MAGA. ✌️☮️

  • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    ·
    6 days ago

    Oh no, are the Boomers finally collectively suffering the consequences of their own collective actions?

    What a shame.

    Anyway, welcome to the ‘you can never retire or afford a house’ club along with all your children who’ve been begging you for the past 20 years to stop voting for policies and politicians who made this current situation inevitable.

      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        … The boomers have majority supported Republicans … for the last 20 years.

        Which I specifically mentioned.

        Your own source shows:

        50-64 at a 56 to 43 for Trump
        65+ tied at 49 to 49

        Wonderful, great, a few of them finally realized that maybe now that they actually need Social Security and they want to actually draw from their 401ks… after majority supporting 401ks over unions+pensions for 20 years.

        How typical. A few of them finally figured out maybe spending 20 years supporting corporate profligacy and then betting their retirements on the stock market … is bad, when the obvious problem with a stock market based retirement plan… actually looks like/is actually happening, to them, personally.

        You are bringing race into this. I did not.

        If you purely go by age alone, which is how you actually define a Boomer…

        30-39 (16%) is 50 to 46, Harris.

        40-49 (16%) is 48 to 50, Trump.

        They are neatly both 16% of the total sample, so…

        30-49 is 49 to 48, Harris.

        Wonderful, younger Millenials to younger to mid GenX went for Harris by a point.

        But I am not talking about them, I am talking about Boomers, over the last 20 years of their existence.

        A tiny bit of the older ones shifted course after it was too late to undo what their disproportionately large, wealthy, and influential generational cohort has supported for 20 years.

        I guess ‘they’ll be sorry/regret their decisions when they’re older’, another common boomerism often directed toward anyone younger than them that makes a life choice or holds a worldview they disagree with.

        This is a perfect time to laugh at Boomers collectively.

        They got what they said they wanted, and only now, after its all too late, did they almost, but not quite, flip over to ‘this is not what i wanted.’

        If this isn’t clear, obviously not all boomers individually deserve this scorn, but uh, collectively… they do.

        • FourWaveforms@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 days ago

          What do you mean “collectively”

          Would you accept responsibility for somebody else’s actions because they were born within the same arbitrary block of years as you?

          • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I mean collectively by collectively.

            Different groups with different specific membership criteria, different descriptive attributes… often, in general, tend to behave differently.

            Try writing a history book involving dynamics and differences between groups that doesn’t involve this. Or a medical study. Or a psychological study.

            Statistics is the art of going from an unfounded stereotype or complete guess to an actually valid characterization of specified groups according to descriptive parameters.

            Of course… these are general descriptors of a group, and do not accurately and perfectly describe every member of a group.

            No, I wouldn’t personally accept responsibility for something a bunch of people my age did… but I would accept that it would be reasonable for other people who didn’t know me personally but just knew my age group to make certain reasonable assumptions about me that are actually borne out my the data.

            Of course, one should always just have that as a kind of background knowledge and not judge every single book you meet by its cover, you should read the contents of their character if you want to really know them.

            But at the same time, that is very time consuming to do with… literally everyone, so it is useful to have basic guidelines for what to expect from certain kinds of people, but not actually judge them or act toward them in a prejudiced way untill they specifically, individually confirm or disconfirm their sameness or difference from your preconceived notion.

            Like uh… I am a millenial, and I know it is statistically valid for me to assume myself and other millenials have actual, comprehensive computer troubleshooting skills than boomers or zoomers.

            I know a boomer is more likely to be a big Led Zeppelin fan, and a zoomer is more likely to be a fan of whateve is on Lo-fi girl… and I know that millenials are more likely to still be using the term ‘doggo’ and ‘chonker’ unironically, as well as think that the dialogue in the Borderlands games is cool.

            Do I use doggo and chonker? Yeah, you got me, I still do sometimes.

            Do I think Borderlands style, ‘Millenial writing’ is good? Fuck no, I hate that shit, bounced off those games half for the bullet spongy gameplay I just didn’t like (Im much more of a realism/tac shooter/milsim kinda guy when it comes to gunplay) and half for the character writing that I found to be just fucking awful, rude, crass, annoying, self-important, cringe inducing.

            I did like the art style though.

            But anyway: I would not be surprised if someone just knew my age, that I like video games and am a dork, didn’t know me beyond that, and then kinda assumed I was into Borderlands for the writing. I would be miffed if they were 100% convinced of this and acted as if it was true without ever actually asking me, but if they did ask, I wouldn’t be offended by the question.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    6 days ago

    I just took a couple Ubers. They were driven by retirees as a way to make a little extra cash and get out of the house. Both of them said they would have to quit driving and get another “real” job again if the market continued to tank. This shit rolls downhill…gonna create a job crunch again. People not leaving jobs, no jobs for people entering the marketplace, and companies are going to start crushing labor’s wages and benefits again.

    • boonhet@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      6 days ago

      Maybe that IS the end goal. Get old people working so wages get fucked for everyone and the corporate overlords can increase their profit margins from a measly 99% to 99.9% or whatever

      • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        And what’s the end goal? What’s their plan for when those old people die in a fiery crash while driving Doordash? Nobody’s having kids anymore and immigration ain’t happening so who’s gonna take those jobs?

        • bitMasque@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Doesn’t matter to them, the rich are isolated from any real repercussions of their behaviours. The older ones probably think they’ll be out of the game before things get worse anyway. Short term benefits for them are worth the long term issues for the rest of us, just as always.

    • maporita@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 days ago

      Only if they voted for Trump. Many didn’t. This election saw a lot more young people, especially men, move to the Republicans. In fact if you want to blame a specific demographic then blame men.

      • TronBronson@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        6 days ago

        I think the blame rest solely on the 78 million people or so that showed up to vote for Donald Trump. And maybe the 40 million or so people that didn’t show up to vote at all.

        • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah it’s definitely not the system that prevents those people from learning critical thinking skills and encourages them to vote explicitly against their own interests, pitting them against each other as they work themselves to death

          Blaming the death cult of capitalism 🚫

          Victim blaming 👍

          • TronBronson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            You’re not the victim. We paid for 12 years of your schooling and you shit the bed in Math, history, critical thinking, and most importantly Civic duty. Since we our way past acknowledging our individual civic duty to protect democracy I say…

            COMMUNIST REVOLUTION WEN?

            • YarHarSuperstar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              6 days ago

              Lol. Do you assume that shit about everyone you talk to or just people who disagree with you

              Edited to add: this schooling? 12 years of this? Thanks a LOT 🖕 https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/02/15/u-s-students-internationally-math-science/

              Edit 2: super thanks for this BTW love your work on this https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/school-shootings-by-country

              Edit 3: i didn’t even claim to be the victim, although I certainly am a victim of capitalism as someone with multiple disabilities that are almost certainly caused by environmental factors present as a result of the unending evil behavior from corporations (including the USG) and many other problems that are inflicted upon me by these systems including artificial scarcity and my rights being whittled down year after year. The victims I was saying you’re blaming are the ~120 million people you explicitly blamed for what is being done to our country and our population and the rest of the world by a few extremely rich and powerful assholes, most of which are almost certainly not responsible for any appreciable fraction of harm being done (relative to what is happening at a massive scale) right before our eyes by those same assholes. By the way, since you’re so upset about what’s happening (according to what you’re saying) what are you doing to counter it? I’m sure it’s more than just spreading your garbage takes on Lemmy right?

  • GoodOleAmerika@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    7 days ago

    Don’t let them fool u by saying that this is just a correction. A correction needs a catalyst. The catalyst here is the tarriff. Trump created this mess. Rise up. Fight.

  • Pacattack57@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 days ago

    I know several people that were suppose to retire next year. Looks like they are gonna have to postpone 😂😂

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    But at least they’re stripping the rights of foreigners and women - that’s what they voted for, right? Cruelty? Fuck those ones and every other Trump voter. Enjoy your inevitable consequence you bastards.

  • ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    257
    ·
    8 days ago

    Clearly they just need to take their own advice:

    1. No more avocado toast

    2. Stop buying so much coffee out. Make it at home.

    3. ???

    4. Profit.

    Simple as.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Maybe they could have remembered to not trust everything they see on the internet for the past decade.

      Oh! And learn some basic financial literacy!

      Can’t just rely on someone else to make all your decisions for you =D

      Time to start by brushing up on some basic math, its not like everyone will always have a calculator in their pocket.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      Don’t forget about the cell phone plan, Internet access, Netflix or large screen TVs. I remember reading about “boomer math”, if I remember correctly - the skewed notion about what really costs what.

      Used to be a color TV was a luxury, and that probably made a real imprint on some. Same for coffee - until Starbucks really cracked that market, the idea of paying more than fifty cents or whatever for a cup of coffee was considered ludicrous at one time. And things like cell phones, Netflix and Internet were not really things in their formative years…

      • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        I just saw the Costco flyer for this week and they had a 75" LG TV on sale for like $599. I couldn’t believe how cheap TVs are now.

        • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 days ago

          Exactly. I think once they started monetizing the data from “smart” TVs, they really, really fell through the floor. And yeah, compare that to memories of the 60s or 70s when a mere color TV of any size was a big deal and definitely a luxury item for the rich and adjust for inflation…in 1965, say, $599 would be $59.13…so if you imprinted on that in your twenties, I could see how that might be hard to understand the delta…

          See the prices for a 23"-25" color TV in 1965 - $1800-$2000. That’d be $18,233 - $20,259 in today’s dollars…so if someone is doing “boomer math” when chastising people for buying huge TVs, and claiming that’s the reason they cannot afford a house/rent, I can sort of get it, but it’s also just a one-time cost…and they really need to update their thinking.

  • “I don’t want to have to worry that everyone is constantly changing my financial reality,” said Alison Carey, 64, of Oregon, a freelancer in the theater industry. “Let the economy do its machinations, but don’t put me in the gears.”

    Sorry you had to learn it this way, Alison, but “the economy” has always been grinding people up in its gears. The main difference is, that it is now reaching you, personally.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      “Swarms of leopards unleashed upon zoo-goers who voted for Leopard Looser to run the zoo, millions of zoo-goers stunned, in disbelief, mauled.”

    • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      I love how people seem to think that “the economy” or “politics” is the same type of thing as sports— a recreational activity with no actual bearing on anything that other people pay attention to as a diversion. It explains so much about how we ended up here.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      “I don’t want to have to worry that everyone is constantly changing my financial reality,”

      Welcome to my entire adult life, Alison

    • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      The main difference is, that it is now reaching you, personally.

      Ah, republicans and not giving a shit until it hurts them, name a more iconic duo.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      a freelancer in the theater industry.

      I wonder what that means. I’m not in the creative industry, but that sounds like that could be barely-subsistence type of money or something in the stratosphere… ?