• 7arakun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    24 minutes ago

    I feel like we keep seeing this headline. “AAA studio says current prices can’t support current budgets”

    I almost never buy games at $60. I buy everything on sale, and there are constantly sales and way more games than I can play. They can charge whatever they want, I personally will be paying less.

    Will the market bear $80 games? Maybe. I feel like a better strategy would be to reign in scope and budget and sell games at prices most people can afford. But who knows?

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 hours ago

    So $89.99 then.

    Special edition with a 6" plastic Temu tat figurine and 1000 FREE BorderBucks will be $249.99.

  • scbasteve7@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If it might be 80$, it might be the only borderlands game I don’t buy.

    Don’t get it twisted, I’ll still play it. But I sure as shit won’t be buying it.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I bought Borderlands for like $30.

      I bought BL2 for $20.

      I got BL3 for free. (Which in kinda glad. The story was so ass.)

      Then I got Tiny Tina’s for like $5 from a bundle.

      Borderlands series hasn’t earned the $80 price tag.

  • vonxylofon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I’ve paid money like that when I could see the effort and love thwt went into the game. I kinda saw that in BL2, but nothing in the series since comes even close.

  • kurcatovium@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Sure, it might be $80,why not? Also I might skip it. Or wait for sensible sale like $5 in a bundle. Backlog keeps expanding anyway and I doubt this will be even worth half the rrlease asking price…

  • lemmyhavesome@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    They’ll probably start it at $80 and be prepared to drop it down if sales are lower than expected. So gamers can tell them that the $80 price point is not ok by being patient and holding off on the purchase.

    • Mike_The_TV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      They’ll still have plenty of people buy it for that shit price if only because they’ll give it free to a bunch of streamers and fomo will get the viewers.

  • Surp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    BL3 was generic and forgettable. BL4 anything more than 40$ is easily forgettable. Don’t these guys know most gamers have backlogs at this point? No one has the money for this shit.

    • vxx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      My wishlist is long and at least one game on it gets a deep discount every week. I’m busy playing games between 2€-20€.

      There hasn’t been a major release that would justify paying 50€ and more for years.

      Baldurs Gate 3 was the last game I got at full price and didn’t regret.

    • VitoRobles@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The more I think about it, maybe it’s for the whales of PC gaming.

      Let the streamers, YouTubers and FOMO folks pay a premium to do all the bug testing.

      Then release a polished version for half the price.

      A person like me with a massive backlog is absolutely going to wait until this hits less than $20 anyways.

      • generaldenmark@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I mean. Of course vidya games’ gonna get hit with inflation from time to time… just like every other product…

        every link in the chain, from producer to consumer needs to have an ever growing increase in profit for capitalism to work

        • LuxSpark@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          18 hours ago

          It’s not worth $80 to me, and that’s also the way prices work. Things are worth what people are willing to pay. I’ve purchased so many games for $20 and less that have given me more enjoyment than any borderlands game.

          • generaldenmark@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            And that’s completely fair as well, but there will be compromises… because 100DKK is not worth the same 100DKK as for 10 years ago, so as time goes by - the games you’ll be able to buy for 100DKK, will have reduced effort equally to the reduction in value of your currency

          • generaldenmark@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            I don’t think I’m shilling for everything… I’ve been sailing the seas for as long as I can remember… I just don’t understand why people keep getting surprised at games increasing in price - have you guys forgotten how capitalism works?

            Like do you go to your local grocery store and see that cheese has yet again shrunk in size, and increased in price, and then think “this’ll never happen to my precious videogames”?

            If so, then I guess I’m sorry to be the bearer of bad news

            • arakhis_@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              just because its common doesnt mean its justified.

              i see youre pirating ok. doesnt make your pro-opinion of increase due to “link from producer to customer” any more true…

              the only blatant justification for n-letter company is exploitation. literally

  • Reisen@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    the thing while yes, inflation will make things more expensive, the more expensive things become the less folks will just spend on random entertainment. they will have to use their money more deliberately and frugally.

    and the problem with games are that there are many free and cheaper alternatives. if you wanna game you can just spend less and still game and have fun.

    if you wanna go to the cinema it pretty much costs what it costs so you might go less often or buy less popcorn but you won’t skip one movie because it’s more expensive than another.

    you can just skip full price AAA games. buy them on sales, play games you already have, play free to play games, emulate retro games, play indie games.

    • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Exactly. Also it’s way costlier to set up a hone theatre at home compared to buying a cheap gaming laptop and play indie oe competitive fps games.

  • stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 day ago

    B1 was fun and interesting, B2 was brilliant, BTPS was fun, but slightly less so than B2, B3 was just annoying cringe.

    And yeah, I played through all the games to completion including the DLCs.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was just flabbergasted that they decided to make all of their perk trees boring and lame. I genuinely don’t remember anything about the characters other than disappointment.

      Roland, Mordecai, Brick, Lilith: character design masterpieces. Distinct styles and strengths but not overly limited. Zer0, Salvador, Gage, Axton, Magic Chick 2: great, less type specialized but that’s not a bad thing.

      Everyone else? Just walking gun stats. And not particularly fun ones.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t even remember bothering with the spec trees on B3.

        I did play as Claptrap i B3 to get some variation, his special was just stupid

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Ah good catch!

            I mixed it up, in BTPS I did indeed play as Claptrap the last time I played it, I played as Moze when I played B3

    • marighost@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Borderlands 3 had some of the best gameplay in any shooter I’ve played, story and difficulty be damned. Tiny Tina’s Wonderlands was back to form, despite its disappointing post-game and 3-room DLCs. The only reason I’m excited for 4 is because the gameplay looks solid and they’ve yet to tell a single joke.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        I never liked the gamplay in B3, though to be fair, I did grow up on UT2004, which other have told me is very floaty, so I may be biased on that…

    • Lightsong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      I bought it in Fall 2024 for like 25 bucks with all DLCs. So I’ll wait year or two with BL4 no problem, there’s plenty other games I can play. I never buy brand new games.